Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study

The asymmetrical nature of the relationship between social workers and their clients may lead to abuse of power due to a human trait or corruption. A high level of power sensitivity is thus crucial to counteract power abuse. Ideally, this topic should be covered during studies, as the risk of corruption rises with everyday working life. In this study, we aimed to assess basic and specific aspects of power sensitivity both for 271 students and 414 professionals, covering (1) general differences for the total sample, (2) differences between both groups and (3) differences between subgroups (semesters, professional years, field of profession; ratings from 0 to 100%). While importance of power sensitivity (94.7%) and professional ethics/principles (91.9%) were rated higher than all other items (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a stark difference was found between the participants' own vs. the anticipated professional groups' power sensitivity (73.9% vs. 53.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A hypothetical individual change for the worse through the power as social worker was rated significantly lower than all other items on the respective scale (61.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Professionals rated the experience of stereotypical ideas and prejudices towards clients (78.5, 75.2%) to be significantly stronger than students (69.4, 67.4% all <i>p</i> < 0.001). For students, power sensitivity generally increased with semesters (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while it remained stable over professional years for social workers. Differences between fields of profession did not reach significance. In summary, both students and professionals emphasized the importance of power sensitivity, but seemed to show a self-serving bias if they compared themselves to their group - considering a possible corruption effect, this may at least be interpreted as problematic. We discuss room for improvement in terms of sensitization, whether in the context of further training (professionals) or curricula (students).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1580234
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study

Michael Belz, Claudia Bartels, Melanie Misamer
Frontiers in Medicine
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
article

Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study

Michael Belz, Claudia Bartels, Melanie Misamer
article en

Abstract

The asymmetrical nature of the relationship between social workers and their clients may lead to abuse of power due to a human trait or corruption. A high level of power sensitivity is thus crucial to counteract power abuse. Ideally, this topic should be covered during studies, as the risk of corruption rises with everyday working life. In this study, we aimed to assess basic and specific aspects of power sensitivity both for 271 students and 414 professionals, covering (1) general differences for the total sample, (2) differences between both groups and (3) differences between subgroups (semesters, professional years, field of profession; ratings from 0 to 100%). While importance of power sensitivity (94.7%) and professional ethics/principles (91.9%) were rated higher than all other items (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a stark difference was found between the participants' own vs. the anticipated professional groups' power sensitivity (73.9% vs. 53.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A hypothetical individual change for the worse through the power as social worker was rated significantly lower than all other items on the respective scale (61.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Professionals rated the experience of stereotypical ideas and prejudices towards clients (78.5, 75.2%) to be significantly stronger than students (69.4, 67.4% all <i>p</i> < 0.001). For students, power sensitivity generally increased with semesters (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while it remained stable over professional years for social workers. Differences between fields of profession did not reach significance. In summary, both students and professionals emphasized the importance of power sensitivity, but seemed to show a self-serving bias if they compared themselves to their group - considering a possible corruption effect, this may at least be interpreted as problematic. We discuss room for improvement in terms of sensitization, whether in the context of further training (professionals) or curricula (students).

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 12
University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.