Pyrogenic carbon and carbonating minerals for carbon capture and storage (PyMiCCS) part II: organic and inorganic carbon dioxide removal in an Oxisol

Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) and pyrogenic carbon capture and storage (PyCCS, or “biochar carbon removal”) are two promising carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques that can contribute to soil restoration. These technologies can be combined by co-application of rock powder and biochar or by co-pyrolysis of rock powder with biomass to produce rock-enhanced (RE) biochar. In a 27-week laboratory experiment, we quantified the carbon (C) sink development of co-applications and RE-biochars produced by co-pyrolysis of basanite rock powder with either 50 or 90 wt% willow wood or 90 wt% wheat straw. Incubators featured two elevated soil pCO 2 levels (0.012 and 0.062 atm, equivalent to about 1.2 and 6.2 Vol-% CO 2 ) in a clay-rich, nutrient-poor Oxisol, with a simulated annual rainfall of 1,600 mm. Results showed strong initial fluxes of total alkalinity (TA), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and major cations (Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , K + , Na + ), which decreased over time. Notably, elevated pCO 2 had minimal impact on the release of DOC but doubled the TA flux from ERW. An important observation was the impact of waterlogging on water fluxes in soil columns without biochar, which lowered the amount of leached cations from rock and biochar. We defined the carbon sink (C-Sink) to include all DIC of geogenic and biogenic origin, and pyrogenic carbon from biochar. Biogenic cations were not considered as contributing to additional CO 2 sequestration. For a soil application equivalent to application of 12 t ha −1 , the total net C-Sink ranged from −0.1 to 30.9 t CO 2 ha −1 after 27 weeks under 1.2 Vol-% CO 2 . We were not able to determine a change in rock weathering rates from co-pyrolysis since biogenic and geogenic cations could not be distinguished. A 20-year forecast suggests net C-Sinks between 0.5 t and 28.7 t CO 2 ha −1 , driven by increased contributions from weathering, alongside a C-Sink loss of carbon due to biochar mineralization. While biochar alone generally produces a larger C-Sink, co-application with rock powder fosters soil remineralization and provides a higher permanence of the C-Sink. Additionally, biochar increases water-holding capacity, prevents waterlogging of soils and likely improves the retention of organic carbon in soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Climate
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1592454
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pyrogenic carbon and carbonating minerals for carbon capture and storage (PyMiCCS) part II: organic and inorganic carbon dioxide removal in an Oxisol

Annette Eschenbach, Maria-Elena Vorrath, Joscha N. Becker, Jens Hartmann et al.
6 citations
Frontiers in Climate
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
4.28
article

Pyrogenic carbon and carbonating minerals for carbon capture and storage (PyMiCCS) part II: organic and inorganic carbon dioxide removal in an Oxisol

Annette Eschenbach, Maria-Elena Vorrath, Joscha N. Becker, Jens Hartmann, Chris Aldrich, Thorben Amann, Nikolas Hagemann, Janine Börker, Mathilde Hagens, Maria Seedtke, Johannes Meyer zu Drewer
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) and pyrogenic carbon capture and storage (PyCCS, or “biochar carbon removal”) are two promising carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques that can contribute to soil restoration. These technologies can be combined by co-application of rock powder and biochar or by co-pyrolysis of rock powder with biomass to produce rock-enhanced (RE) biochar. In a 27-week laboratory experiment, we quantified the carbon (C) sink development of co-applications and RE-biochars produced by co-pyrolysis of basanite rock powder with either 50 or 90 wt% willow wood or 90 wt% wheat straw. Incubators featured two elevated soil pCO 2 levels (0.012 and 0.062 atm, equivalent to about 1.2 and 6.2 Vol-% CO 2 ) in a clay-rich, nutrient-poor Oxisol, with a simulated annual rainfall of 1,600 mm. Results showed strong initial fluxes of total alkalinity (TA), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and major cations (Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , K + , Na + ), which decreased over time. Notably, elevated pCO 2 had minimal impact on the release of DOC but doubled the TA flux from ERW. An important observation was the impact of waterlogging on water fluxes in soil columns without biochar, which lowered the amount of leached cations from rock and biochar. We defined the carbon sink (C-Sink) to include all DIC of geogenic and biogenic origin, and pyrogenic carbon from biochar. Biogenic cations were not considered as contributing to additional CO 2 sequestration. For a soil application equivalent to application of 12 t ha −1 , the total net C-Sink ranged from −0.1 to 30.9 t CO 2 ha −1 after 27 weeks under 1.2 Vol-% CO 2 . We were not able to determine a change in rock weathering rates from co-pyrolysis since biogenic and geogenic cations could not be distinguished. A 20-year forecast suggests net C-Sinks between 0.5 t and 28.7 t CO 2 ha −1 , driven by increased contributions from weathering, alongside a C-Sink loss of carbon due to biochar mineralization. While biochar alone generally produces a larger C-Sink, co-application with rock powder fosters soil remineralization and provides a higher permanence of the C-Sink. Additionally, biochar increases water-holding capacity, prevents waterlogging of soils and likely improves the retention of organic carbon in soils.

Frontiers in ClimateVol. 7
Universität Hamburg (DE), Ithaka Institute for Carbon Strategies (CH), Agroscope (CH), Offenburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
4.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.