Assessing Environmental Pollution: Quality Control Using CRITIC-WASPAS Methodsunder Intuitionistic Fuzzy Z-Numbers

Abstract. Industrial pollution is still a major worldwide issue. Strong decision-making frameworks are required to evaluate and reduce its detrimental effects on the environment. An extensive case study assessing different industrial pollution produced by the energy industry, textile industry, chemical industry, manufacturing industry, agriculture industry, and construction industry and its environmental impact is presented in this paper. We present a structured evaluation of environmental degradation by analyzing key environmental criteria, including waste generation, noise pollution, soil contamination, air pollution, and water pollution. In order to accomplish a systematic and objective evaluation, we provide an advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that combines the CRITIC-WASPAS and CRITIC-EDAS approaches with intuitionistic fuzzy Z-number (IFZN). This integration ensures a more reliable, flexible, and data-driven assessment of industrial pollution sources by addressing uncertainty, imprecision, and inconsistency in the data effectively. In order to determine the objective weights of environmental criteria , the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method is applied here. These weights undergo additional processing using the WASPAS and EDAS approaches, which combine aggregated sum product weighting (WASPAS) and positive and negative distance based evaluation (EDAS) to check the ranking of given criteria. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is used to assess the robustness and dependability of the suggested fuzzy model by altering input parameters, including weights, membership values, and decision-maker preferences. Moreover, a comparison with earlier approaches is carried out to evaluate the consistency and accuracy of the proposed model’s ranking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Punjab University Journal of Mathematics
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52280/pujm.2025.57(02)02
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Environmental Pollution: Quality Control Using CRITIC-WASPAS Methodsunder Intuitionistic Fuzzy Z-Numbers

Asim Zafar, A. Mujeeb, Bushra Khalid
Punjab University Journal of Mathematics
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Assessing Environmental Pollution: Quality Control Using CRITIC-WASPAS Methodsunder Intuitionistic Fuzzy Z-Numbers

Asim Zafar, A. Mujeeb, Bushra Khalid
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Industrial pollution is still a major worldwide issue. Strong decision-making frameworks are required to evaluate and reduce its detrimental effects on the environment. An extensive case study assessing different industrial pollution produced by the energy industry, textile industry, chemical industry, manufacturing industry, agriculture industry, and construction industry and its environmental impact is presented in this paper. We present a structured evaluation of environmental degradation by analyzing key environmental criteria, including waste generation, noise pollution, soil contamination, air pollution, and water pollution. In order to accomplish a systematic and objective evaluation, we provide an advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that combines the CRITIC-WASPAS and CRITIC-EDAS approaches with intuitionistic fuzzy Z-number (IFZN). This integration ensures a more reliable, flexible, and data-driven assessment of industrial pollution sources by addressing uncertainty, imprecision, and inconsistency in the data effectively. In order to determine the objective weights of environmental criteria , the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method is applied here. These weights undergo additional processing using the WASPAS and EDAS approaches, which combine aggregated sum product weighting (WASPAS) and positive and negative distance based evaluation (EDAS) to check the ranking of given criteria. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is used to assess the robustness and dependability of the suggested fuzzy model by altering input parameters, including weights, membership values, and decision-maker preferences. Moreover, a comparison with earlier approaches is carried out to evaluate the consistency and accuracy of the proposed model’s ranking.

Punjab University Journal of Mathematics
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Environmental Pollution: Quality Control Using CRITIC-WASPAS Methodsunder Intuitionistic Fuzzy Z-Numbers — Asim Zafar, A. Mujeeb, et al. · Punjab University Journal of Mathematics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS