Evaluation of the effectiveness of first trimester screening of pregnancy in the implementation of “major obstetric syndromes” in the Samara region

Aim – to evaluate the effectiveness of first trimester screening in predicting major obstetric syndromes: preeclampsia (PE), intrauterine growth restriction (IGR) and preterm birth (PB). Material and methods. We analyzed the results of first trimester screening and pregnancy outcomes in 992 patients included in the risk groups for PE, IGR and PB according to the Astrae program. Results. Preeclampsia leads in the number of calculated risks, both isolated, 47.4%, and in combination with IGR, 27.6%. 75.4% of women did not realize the probability of one or another pregnancy complication despite the fact that they were assigned to the risk group based on the screening results. The incidence rate of preeclampsia was 3.6%, and that of IGR was 9%. Preeclampsia occurred in 4.3% of patients in the corresponding risk group, IGR, in 11.6%, respectively. In 31.2% of women with IGR, low risks were calculated for IGR, and high risks for PE. However, the established risk of IGR is associated with an increase in the frequency of spontaneous miscarriage in the observed group. In the group of calculated high risk for PR, this complication did not occur in any case, while in other risk groups (IGR and PE), premature births were observed in 5.3% of cases. Conclusion. The first trimester screening generally accepted in the Russian Federation is quite inaccurate in terms of risk prediction. The obtained characteristics of the effectiveness of this study suggest the inevitability of revising approaches to first trimester screening and replacing the studied biomarkers. In the group we observed, patients who subsequently experienced spontaneous miscarriage had significantly increased risks of IGR. This fact should be verified on a larger sample of patients with such an unfavorable pregnancy outcome, which requires further research in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35693/avp680098
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of first trimester screening of pregnancy in the implementation of “major obstetric syndromes” in the Samara region

Valentina Balashova, M.A. Kaganova, Maria Alexandrovna Yakovleva, Gelshat Midekhatovna Minnigulova
Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of first trimester screening of pregnancy in the implementation of “major obstetric syndromes” in the Samara region

Valentina Balashova, M.A. Kaganova, Maria Alexandrovna Yakovleva, Gelshat Midekhatovna Minnigulova
article en

Abstract

Aim – to evaluate the effectiveness of first trimester screening in predicting major obstetric syndromes: preeclampsia (PE), intrauterine growth restriction (IGR) and preterm birth (PB). Material and methods. We analyzed the results of first trimester screening and pregnancy outcomes in 992 patients included in the risk groups for PE, IGR and PB according to the Astrae program. Results. Preeclampsia leads in the number of calculated risks, both isolated, 47.4%, and in combination with IGR, 27.6%. 75.4% of women did not realize the probability of one or another pregnancy complication despite the fact that they were assigned to the risk group based on the screening results. The incidence rate of preeclampsia was 3.6%, and that of IGR was 9%. Preeclampsia occurred in 4.3% of patients in the corresponding risk group, IGR, in 11.6%, respectively. In 31.2% of women with IGR, low risks were calculated for IGR, and high risks for PE. However, the established risk of IGR is associated with an increase in the frequency of spontaneous miscarriage in the observed group. In the group of calculated high risk for PR, this complication did not occur in any case, while in other risk groups (IGR and PE), premature births were observed in 5.3% of cases. Conclusion. The first trimester screening generally accepted in the Russian Federation is quite inaccurate in terms of risk prediction. The obtained characteristics of the effectiveness of this study suggest the inevitability of revising approaches to first trimester screening and replacing the studied biomarkers. In the group we observed, patients who subsequently experienced spontaneous miscarriage had significantly increased risks of IGR. This fact should be verified on a larger sample of patients with such an unfavorable pregnancy outcome, which requires further research in this area.

Aspirantskiy Vestnik PovolzhiyaVol. 25(3)
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), Samara State Medical University (RU), Samara Regional Clinical Hospital named after V.D. Seredavina (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.