Scenario Storylines for Carbon Dioxide Removal in Germany: Drawing From Regional Perspectives

ABSTRACT Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is indispensable for reaching the German climate neutrality target as a complementary strategy alongside reducing and avoiding greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass can be used in various ways to deliver bio‐based CDR, including Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), natural sink enhancement, and biomass‐based construction materials. By focusing on bio‐based solutions, actions can be streamlined to achieve both CDR and a range of co‐benefits; for example, in terms of ecosystem services. The ramp‐up of bio‐based CDR in Germany is driven by a diverse set of factors. In this study, scenarios were developed that allow for exploring these factors in a set of narratives. The selection of key drivers followed the PESTEL approach (Policy, Environmental, Social, Technological, Economic, and Legal aspects), to which the Biomass category was added. Desirable net‐zero futures and drivers identified in stakeholder surveys, interviews, and workshops were translated into consistent scenario storylines. These represent diverse bio‐based CDR portfolios that differ in the implementation level of single concepts and in the overall contribution to negative emissions for Germany in 2045, considering the national potentials for different CDR options. The scenarios encompass (1) a focus on cost efficiency, (2) prioritizing decentralized options and natural sinks, (3) larger amounts of bio‐based CDR (skyrocketing), and (4) little support for bio‐based CDR (roadblock). The scenario storylines and drivers can inform modeling for cost‐optimized implementation and paint a picture of potential developments for stakeholders. They can also serve as a basis for compiling bio‐based value chains with maximum removal capacities that deliver a series of additional system benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70075
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scenario Storylines for Carbon Dioxide Removal in Germany: Drawing From Regional Perspectives

Daniela Thrän, Nóra Szarka, Danial Esmaeili Aliabadi, Robert Tremmel et al.
3 citations
GCB Bioenergy
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
article

Scenario Storylines for Carbon Dioxide Removal in Germany: Drawing From Regional Perspectives

Daniela Thrän, Nóra Szarka, Danial Esmaeili Aliabadi, Robert Tremmel, Danny Otto, Mohammad Sadr, Nils Matzner, Ronja Wollnik, Joshua Röbisch
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is indispensable for reaching the German climate neutrality target as a complementary strategy alongside reducing and avoiding greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass can be used in various ways to deliver bio‐based CDR, including Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), natural sink enhancement, and biomass‐based construction materials. By focusing on bio‐based solutions, actions can be streamlined to achieve both CDR and a range of co‐benefits; for example, in terms of ecosystem services. The ramp‐up of bio‐based CDR in Germany is driven by a diverse set of factors. In this study, scenarios were developed that allow for exploring these factors in a set of narratives. The selection of key drivers followed the PESTEL approach (Policy, Environmental, Social, Technological, Economic, and Legal aspects), to which the Biomass category was added. Desirable net‐zero futures and drivers identified in stakeholder surveys, interviews, and workshops were translated into consistent scenario storylines. These represent diverse bio‐based CDR portfolios that differ in the implementation level of single concepts and in the overall contribution to negative emissions for Germany in 2045, considering the national potentials for different CDR options. The scenarios encompass (1) a focus on cost efficiency, (2) prioritizing decentralized options and natural sinks, (3) larger amounts of bio‐based CDR (skyrocketing), and (4) little support for bio‐based CDR (roadblock). The scenario storylines and drivers can inform modeling for cost‐optimized implementation and paint a picture of potential developments for stakeholders. They can also serve as a basis for compiling bio‐based value chains with maximum removal capacities that deliver a series of additional system benefits.

GCB BioenergyVol. 17(9)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Calgary (CA), Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.