Is Religious Plurality in the Way of Theism?

In this article I critically analyse both Alexander Khramov’s way of ‘neutralising’ religiousdiversity in favour of theism and his conviction that this ‘neutralisation’ itself is in the inte-rests of theism. In contrast, I demonstrate that the proposed attempt to scientifically disman-tle polytheistic religious experience can just as easily be turned to dismantle monotheisticexperience, and a parallel is drawn with the old simple-minded use of the concept of euhe-merism to expose paganism. However, I consider the much more balanced W. Alston’s em-barrassment because of the lack of independent weights for comparative weighing of Chris-tian and non-Christian religious perceptions as a consequence of scientism (and perhaps po-litical correctness). I offer many examples of how people make judgements about thingsother than religion with good reason and without ‘independent sources’, which for thesecases simply do not exist, and for comparative procedures I propose instead of scientific as-sociations artistic associations and what Immanuel Kant called ‘judgements of taste’. I con-clude with some speculations as to what the answer to the ‘challenge of pluralism’ might befrom the standpoint of a theism based on Scripture and Tradition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Religion Analytic Researches
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/2587-683x-2025-9-1-47-61
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Religious Plurality in the Way of Theism?

Vladimir Shokhin
Philosophy of Religion Analytic Researches
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

Is Religious Plurality in the Way of Theism?

Vladimir Shokhin
article en

Abstract

In this article I critically analyse both Alexander Khramov’s way of ‘neutralising’ religiousdiversity in favour of theism and his conviction that this ‘neutralisation’ itself is in the inte-rests of theism. In contrast, I demonstrate that the proposed attempt to scientifically disman-tle polytheistic religious experience can just as easily be turned to dismantle monotheisticexperience, and a parallel is drawn with the old simple-minded use of the concept of euhe-merism to expose paganism. However, I consider the much more balanced W. Alston’s em-barrassment because of the lack of independent weights for comparative weighing of Chris-tian and non-Christian religious perceptions as a consequence of scientism (and perhaps po-litical correctness). I offer many examples of how people make judgements about thingsother than religion with good reason and without ‘independent sources’, which for thesecases simply do not exist, and for comparative procedures I propose instead of scientific as-sociations artistic associations and what Immanuel Kant called ‘judgements of taste’. I con-clude with some speculations as to what the answer to the ‘challenge of pluralism’ might befrom the standpoint of a theism based on Scripture and Tradition.

Philosophy of Religion Analytic ResearchesVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is Religious Plurality in the Way of Theism? — Vladimir Shokhin · Philosophy of Religion Analytic Researches (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS