Black and Some Other Race: Examining Shifts in the Black Latino Population in the Census Bureau’s 2020 Race Question

The 2020 census race question featured a write-in response area to the Black race category as a way to capture detailed race responses. Evidence suggests that respondents who wrote a Hispanic or Latino origin response (i.e., Dominican or Panamanian) in this response area were reclassified as “Black” and “Some Other Race” (SOR) and tabulated as multiracial. In effect, the number of single-race Black Latinos declined by 3 percent since 2010, while the Black and SOR Latino count surged by 223 percent. These trends have been difficult to observe empirically because write-in responses to the race question are not readily available in public microdata. In this study, we leverage ancestry data from the American Community Survey (ACS) to assess how these changes may have influenced the odds of multirace classification among Black Latinos. Our findings suggest that Black Latinos who reported racially distinct ancestries (e.g., African American and Panamanian) were less likely to be classified as multiracial in the 2020 question design compared to those who solely reported a Hispanic or Latino ancestry. This implies that coding schemes used in the 2020 race question could be overestimating multiracial counts by disqualifying Hispanic or Latino origin responses from Black categorical membership. Moreover, these shifts point to the construction of a boundary that officially draws a line between “Black” and “Hispanic or Latino” membership at the cost of disregarding those Black Latinos who may see both categories as mutually inclusive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492251360333
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Black and Some Other Race: Examining Shifts in the Black Latino Population in the Census Bureau’s 2020 Race Question

Nancy López, Yasmiyn Irizarry, Ricardo Henrique Lowe, Edward D. Vargas et al.
1 citations
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
4.20
article

Black and Some Other Race: Examining Shifts in the Black Latino Population in the Census Bureau’s 2020 Race Question

Nancy López, Yasmiyn Irizarry, Ricardo Henrique Lowe, Edward D. Vargas, Shania Montufar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The 2020 census race question featured a write-in response area to the Black race category as a way to capture detailed race responses. Evidence suggests that respondents who wrote a Hispanic or Latino origin response (i.e., Dominican or Panamanian) in this response area were reclassified as “Black” and “Some Other Race” (SOR) and tabulated as multiracial. In effect, the number of single-race Black Latinos declined by 3 percent since 2010, while the Black and SOR Latino count surged by 223 percent. These trends have been difficult to observe empirically because write-in responses to the race question are not readily available in public microdata. In this study, we leverage ancestry data from the American Community Survey (ACS) to assess how these changes may have influenced the odds of multirace classification among Black Latinos. Our findings suggest that Black Latinos who reported racially distinct ancestries (e.g., African American and Panamanian) were less likely to be classified as multiracial in the 2020 question design compared to those who solely reported a Hispanic or Latino ancestry. This implies that coding schemes used in the 2020 race question could be overestimating multiracial counts by disqualifying Hispanic or Latino origin responses from Black categorical membership. Moreover, these shifts point to the construction of a boundary that officially draws a line between “Black” and “Hispanic or Latino” membership at the cost of disregarding those Black Latinos who may see both categories as mutually inclusive.

Sociology of Race and EthnicityVol. 12(2)
University of New Mexico (US), Arizona State University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.