Interval estimation for three-class Youden index with verification bias

Youden index is one of the broadly used measurements to assess the accuracy of the diagnostic test under consideration. In real medical diagnostic studies, verification of the true disease status might only be partially available due to ethical and cost considerations, and the drawbacks of gold-standard tests. Therefore, statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a test based only on data from subjects with verified disease status is typically biased. Youden indices for the assessment of accuracy and optimal cutoff point(s) selection in diagnostic tests classifying two disease stages and three disease stages have been proposed without considering this verification bias. In this article, we develop novel confidence intervals for three-class Youden index to correct verification bias under the assumption that the true disease status, if missing, is missing at random (MAR). The proposed methods provide a comprehensive guide to dealing with the verification bias in diagnostic test accuracy studies and lead to a better choice of diagnostic tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2025.2549361
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interval estimation for three-class Youden index with verification bias

Shuangfei Shi, Gengsheng Qin, Shirui Wang
2 links
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Interval estimation for three-class Youden index with verification bias

Shuangfei Shi, Gengsheng Qin, Shirui Wang
article en

Abstract

Youden index is one of the broadly used measurements to assess the accuracy of the diagnostic test under consideration. In real medical diagnostic studies, verification of the true disease status might only be partially available due to ethical and cost considerations, and the drawbacks of gold-standard tests. Therefore, statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a test based only on data from subjects with verified disease status is typically biased. Youden indices for the assessment of accuracy and optimal cutoff point(s) selection in diagnostic tests classifying two disease stages and three disease stages have been proposed without considering this verification bias. In this article, we develop novel confidence intervals for three-class Youden index to correct verification bias under the assumption that the true disease status, if missing, is missing at random (MAR). The proposed methods provide a comprehensive guide to dealing with the verification bias in diagnostic test accuracy studies and lead to a better choice of diagnostic tests.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Georgia State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.