Exploring the Efficacy of ChatGPT-Based Feedback Compared With Teacher Feedback and Self-Feedback: Evidence From Chinese-English Translation

ChatGPT, a cutting-edge AI-powered Chatbot, can quickly generate responses to given commands. While ChatGPT was reported to have the capacity to deliver useful feedback, it is still unclear about its effectiveness compared with conventional feedback approaches, such as self-feedback (SF) and teacher feedback (TF). To address this issue, this study compared the revised Chinese to English translation texts produced by 45 Chinese Master of Translation and Interpretation (MTI) students, who learned English as a Second Language (ESL), based on three feedback types (i.e., SF, TF, and ChatGPT feedback). The data was analyzed using BLEU score to gauge the overall translation quality as well as Coh-Metrix to examine linguistic features across three dimensions: lexicon, syntax, and cohesion. The findings revealed that SF and TF-guided translation texts surpassed those with ChatGPT feedback, as indicated by the BLEU score. In terms of linguistic features, ChatGPT feedback demonstrated superiority, particularly in enhancing lexical capability and referential cohesion in the translation texts. However, SF and TF proved more effective in developing syntax-related skills, as they addressed instances of incorrect usage of the passive voice. These diverse outcomes indicate ChatGPT’s potential as a supplementary resource, complementing traditional teacher-led methods in translation practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251369204
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Efficacy of ChatGPT-Based Feedback Compared With Teacher Feedback and Self-Feedback: Evidence From Chinese-English Translation

Tongquan Zhou, Siyi Cao
5 citations
SAGE Open
Online Learning and Analytics
8.47
article

Exploring the Efficacy of ChatGPT-Based Feedback Compared With Teacher Feedback and Self-Feedback: Evidence From Chinese-English Translation

Tongquan Zhou, Siyi Cao
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ChatGPT, a cutting-edge AI-powered Chatbot, can quickly generate responses to given commands. While ChatGPT was reported to have the capacity to deliver useful feedback, it is still unclear about its effectiveness compared with conventional feedback approaches, such as self-feedback (SF) and teacher feedback (TF). To address this issue, this study compared the revised Chinese to English translation texts produced by 45 Chinese Master of Translation and Interpretation (MTI) students, who learned English as a Second Language (ESL), based on three feedback types (i.e., SF, TF, and ChatGPT feedback). The data was analyzed using BLEU score to gauge the overall translation quality as well as Coh-Metrix to examine linguistic features across three dimensions: lexicon, syntax, and cohesion. The findings revealed that SF and TF-guided translation texts surpassed those with ChatGPT feedback, as indicated by the BLEU score. In terms of linguistic features, ChatGPT feedback demonstrated superiority, particularly in enhancing lexical capability and referential cohesion in the translation texts. However, SF and TF proved more effective in developing syntax-related skills, as they addressed instances of incorrect usage of the passive voice. These diverse outcomes indicate ChatGPT’s potential as a supplementary resource, complementing traditional teacher-led methods in translation practice.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(3)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Online Learning and Analytics
8.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.