Predicting secondary myeloid neoplasms in acquired aplastic anemia using machine learning models

Patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) face up to a 20% long-term risk of developing secondary myeloid neoplasms (sMNs), including acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative and prevents sMNs, older patients and those lacking suitable donors have historically received IST as first-line therapy. Recent improvements in HSCT outcomes have expanded transplant eligibility, highlighting the need for tools to better identify patients at high risk for sMN. Validated predictive models could help guide early HSCT consideration or tailor surveillance strategies. We developed 2 binary machine learning models to predict sMN development in patients with acquired AA at clinically relevant time points: diagnosis (model 1) and 6 months after IST response (model 2). We analyzed data from 275 adult patients with AA treated at University of Texas Southwestern, Cleveland Clinic, and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 1975 and 2023. Seventy-nine clinical variables were collected, including demographics, somatic mutations, and treatment response. Neural networks were trained with leave-1-out crossvalidation. Both models achieved strong performance (area under the curve, 0.82; sensitivity, 0.82, specificity, 0.73). Shared key predictors included <i>DNMT3A</i> mutation, <i>CUX1</i> mutation, total mutation count, and age. <i>TET2</i> mutation was specific to model 1; paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone presence was unique to model 2. High-risk classification was significantly associated with worse overall survival (<i>P</i> < .0001). These findings support the feasibility of machine learning-based sMN risk prediction in AA. With training on larger data sets and external validation, these models may support individualized decision-making around HSCT and post-IST surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Neoplasia
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100163
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting secondary myeloid neoplasms in acquired aplastic anemia using machine learning models

Munevver Duran, Zoe Bass, Julio Alvarenga Thiebaud, Daria V. Babushok et al.
Blood Neoplasia
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
article

Predicting secondary myeloid neoplasms in acquired aplastic anemia using machine learning models

Munevver Duran, Zoe Bass, Julio Alvarenga Thiebaud, Daria V. Babushok, Ligia Guerrero, Taha Bat, Ibrahim Khider Ibrahim, Julia J Shi, Mutlu Mete, Carmelo Gurnari, Hussein Awada, Jaroslaw Pawel Maciejewski, Carlos I. Ayala-Santos, Alper Olcal, Zehra Tombul, Ahmet Toprak, Yusuf M. Ozcan
article en

Abstract

Patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) face up to a 20% long-term risk of developing secondary myeloid neoplasms (sMNs), including acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative and prevents sMNs, older patients and those lacking suitable donors have historically received IST as first-line therapy. Recent improvements in HSCT outcomes have expanded transplant eligibility, highlighting the need for tools to better identify patients at high risk for sMN. Validated predictive models could help guide early HSCT consideration or tailor surveillance strategies. We developed 2 binary machine learning models to predict sMN development in patients with acquired AA at clinically relevant time points: diagnosis (model 1) and 6 months after IST response (model 2). We analyzed data from 275 adult patients with AA treated at University of Texas Southwestern, Cleveland Clinic, and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 1975 and 2023. Seventy-nine clinical variables were collected, including demographics, somatic mutations, and treatment response. Neural networks were trained with leave-1-out crossvalidation. Both models achieved strong performance (area under the curve, 0.82; sensitivity, 0.82, specificity, 0.73). Shared key predictors included <i>DNMT3A</i> mutation, <i>CUX1</i> mutation, total mutation count, and age. <i>TET2</i> mutation was specific to model 1; paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone presence was unique to model 2. High-risk classification was significantly associated with worse overall survival (<i>P</i> < .0001). These findings support the feasibility of machine learning-based sMN risk prediction in AA. With training on larger data sets and external validation, these models may support individualized decision-making around HSCT and post-IST surveillance.

Blood NeoplasiaVol. 2(4)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of North Texas (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.