Power of Place: How Place Satisfaction Impacts Disaster Recovery in Communities Facing Environmental Disruptions

The increasing frequency and evolving patterns of environmental disasters have underscored the importance of effective recovery efforts as a cornerstone of long-term adaptation to environmental shocks. Emerging research highlights that place satisfaction, a concept rooted in psychology and urban sociology, plays a meaningful role in shaping how communities respond to and recover from such events. This study investigates the correlation between place satisfaction and disaster recovery in four communities in Puerto Rico following the impacts of Hurricanes Maria and Fiona. After conducting a survey, we identify a positive correlation between place satisfaction and perceived recovery outcomes, suggesting a potential link between residents’ satisfaction with their surroundings and their ability to recover postdisaster; however, it is also possible that successful disaster recovery enhances residents’ place satisfaction. Although the association is clear, the direction of causality remains an open question, pointing to the need for further research to better understand this dynamic relationship. This study uses a framework for examining the correlation between disaster recovery and place satisfaction, offering indicators to measure each concept. Place satisfaction is assessed across five resource domains: economic, environmental, social, physical, and governmental, whereas disaster recovery is evaluated using six dimensions: physical and infrastructural recovery, institutional capacity, leadership effectiveness, economic revitalization, environmental restoration, and social recovery. By clarifying the link between these two concepts, the framework provides a valuable tool for policymakers, researchers, and urban planners and can inform proactive, evidence-based strategies that support effective disaster recovery, especially as adapting to increasing environmental risks becomes an urgent priority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Hazards Review
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2421
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power of Place: How Place Satisfaction Impacts Disaster Recovery in Communities Facing Environmental Disruptions

Saeideh Sobhaninia, Fernando I. Rivera, Marino Bonaiuto, Safiyeh Tayebi et al.
1 citations
Natural Hazards Review
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
4.20
article

Power of Place: How Place Satisfaction Impacts Disaster Recovery in Communities Facing Environmental Disruptions

Saeideh Sobhaninia, Fernando I. Rivera, Marino Bonaiuto, Safiyeh Tayebi, Melika Amirzadeh, Ebrahim Rastar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing frequency and evolving patterns of environmental disasters have underscored the importance of effective recovery efforts as a cornerstone of long-term adaptation to environmental shocks. Emerging research highlights that place satisfaction, a concept rooted in psychology and urban sociology, plays a meaningful role in shaping how communities respond to and recover from such events. This study investigates the correlation between place satisfaction and disaster recovery in four communities in Puerto Rico following the impacts of Hurricanes Maria and Fiona. After conducting a survey, we identify a positive correlation between place satisfaction and perceived recovery outcomes, suggesting a potential link between residents’ satisfaction with their surroundings and their ability to recover postdisaster; however, it is also possible that successful disaster recovery enhances residents’ place satisfaction. Although the association is clear, the direction of causality remains an open question, pointing to the need for further research to better understand this dynamic relationship. This study uses a framework for examining the correlation between disaster recovery and place satisfaction, offering indicators to measure each concept. Place satisfaction is assessed across five resource domains: economic, environmental, social, physical, and governmental, whereas disaster recovery is evaluated using six dimensions: physical and infrastructural recovery, institutional capacity, leadership effectiveness, economic revitalization, environmental restoration, and social recovery. By clarifying the link between these two concepts, the framework provides a valuable tool for policymakers, researchers, and urban planners and can inform proactive, evidence-based strategies that support effective disaster recovery, especially as adapting to increasing environmental risks becomes an urgent priority.

Natural Hazards ReviewVol. 26(4)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Central Florida (US), Artistic Realization Technologies (US), Arizona State University (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.