The effect of funding for disadvantaged students on academic underachievement

Abstract We estimate the effect of school funding for disadvantaged students on academic underachievement in primary education. For this purpose, we exploit a policy in Belgium that granted additional funding for schools with a share of disadvantaged students of at least 10%. Combining stochastic frontier analysis (a method to measure efficiency) with regression discontinuity design, we find that while additional funding does not affect achievement, it does help reduce underachievement. As a result, the policy has helped bringing students impacted by it closer to realizing their full potential compared to their peers who were not included in the policy. From a policy perspective, our findings indicate that maintaining targeted remedial measures is essential for enhancing effectiveness. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of analyzing both underachievement and achievement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05524-1
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of funding for disadvantaged students on academic underachievement

Kristof De Witte, Deni Mazrekaj, Oleg Badunenko, Subal C. Kumbhakar
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
School Choice and Performance
article

The effect of funding for disadvantaged students on academic underachievement

Kristof De Witte, Deni Mazrekaj, Oleg Badunenko, Subal C. Kumbhakar
article en

Abstract

Abstract We estimate the effect of school funding for disadvantaged students on academic underachievement in primary education. For this purpose, we exploit a policy in Belgium that granted additional funding for schools with a share of disadvantaged students of at least 10%. Combining stochastic frontier analysis (a method to measure efficiency) with regression discontinuity design, we find that while additional funding does not affect achievement, it does help reduce underachievement. As a result, the policy has helped bringing students impacted by it closer to realizing their full potential compared to their peers who were not included in the policy. From a policy perspective, our findings indicate that maintaining targeted remedial measures is essential for enhancing effectiveness. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of analyzing both underachievement and achievement.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Binghamton University (US), Utrecht University (NL), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL), University of Oxford (GB), Brunel University of London (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The effect of funding for disadvantaged students on academic underachievement — Kristof De Witte, Deni Mazrekaj, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS