Skilful global seasonal predictions from a machine learning weather model trained on reanalysis data

Abstract Machine learning weather models trained on observed atmospheric conditions can outperform conventional physics-based models at short- to medium-range (1–14 day) forecast timescales. Here we take the machine learning model ACE2, trained to predict 6-hourly steps in atmospheric evolution and which can remain stable over long forecast periods, and assess it from a seasonal forecasting perspective (1–3 month lead time). Applying persisted sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice anomalies centred on 1 st November each year, we initialise a lagged ensemble of seasonal predictions covering 1993/1994 to 2015/2016. Over this 23-year period there is remarkable similarity in the patterns of predictability with a leading physics-based model. The ACE2 model exhibits skilful predictions of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) with a correlation score of 0.47 ( p = 0.02), as well as a realistic global distribution of skill and ensemble spread. Surprisingly, ACE2 is found to exhibit a signal-to-noise error as seen in physics-based models, in which it is better at predicting the real world than itself. Examining predictions of winter 2009/2010 indicates potential limitations of ACE2 in capturing extreme seasonal conditions that extend outside the training data. This study reveals that machine learning weather models can produce skilful global seasonal predictions and provide new opportunities for increased understanding, development and generation of near-term climate predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01198-3
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skilful global seasonal predictions from a machine learning weather model trained on reanalysis data

Doug Smith, Thomas D. Dunstan, Chris Kent, Oliver Watt‐Meyer et al.
6 citations
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Climate variability and models
6.63
article

Skilful global seasonal predictions from a machine learning weather model trained on reanalysis data

Doug Smith, Thomas D. Dunstan, Chris Kent, Oliver Watt‐Meyer, Steven C. Hardiman, Nick Dunstone, Adam A. Scaife
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning weather models trained on observed atmospheric conditions can outperform conventional physics-based models at short- to medium-range (1–14 day) forecast timescales. Here we take the machine learning model ACE2, trained to predict 6-hourly steps in atmospheric evolution and which can remain stable over long forecast periods, and assess it from a seasonal forecasting perspective (1–3 month lead time). Applying persisted sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice anomalies centred on 1 st November each year, we initialise a lagged ensemble of seasonal predictions covering 1993/1994 to 2015/2016. Over this 23-year period there is remarkable similarity in the patterns of predictability with a leading physics-based model. The ACE2 model exhibits skilful predictions of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) with a correlation score of 0.47 ( p = 0.02), as well as a realistic global distribution of skill and ensemble spread. Surprisingly, ACE2 is found to exhibit a signal-to-noise error as seen in physics-based models, in which it is better at predicting the real world than itself. Examining predictions of winter 2009/2010 indicates potential limitations of ACE2 in capturing extreme seasonal conditions that extend outside the training data. This study reveals that machine learning weather models can produce skilful global seasonal predictions and provide new opportunities for increased understanding, development and generation of near-term climate predictions.

npj Climate and Atmospheric ScienceVol. 8(1)
Met Office (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
Met Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate variability and models
6.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.