Preload During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: Comparison Between Crystalloid and Colloid Solutions

Background: Maternal hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery remains a major problem. Different techniques are used to counteract this deleterious effect. Different studies showed that colloid is a better preload solution in comparison to crystalloid for the prevention of post-spinal hypotension. The aim of the current study was to find the effects of volume preload with either crystalloid or colloid on changes in maternal blood pressure and neonatal outcome during elective caesarean section. Materials and and methods: This open-label Randomized clinical trial was carried out in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH) during the period January December 2017. One hundred and ten subjects, who were admitted for the elective caesarean section, were selected as per inclusion and exclusion criteria, and randomly assigned to one of the two groups after written informed consent had been obtained from each patient. Fifty-five subjects in each group received preload either with Hartman’s solution (Group A) or hydroxyethyl starch 6% (Group B) before induction of spinal anaesthesia. The incidence of hypotension (Systolic blood pressure 20% to 30% fall from baseline) and the amount of ephedrine used to treat hypotension were compared. Neonatal outcome was measured by Apgar score at 1 and at 5 minutes after delivery. Results: There was no difference in the demographic and gestational characteristics between the two groups. Baseline blood pressure was also comparable between the two groups. The sample size was 108 (53 in Group A and 55 in Group B) because 2 patients in Group A spinal induction failed. Incidence of hypotension (43.39% vs. 29.09%) and required dose of ephedrine (12.19mg vs. 10 mg) was more in the crystalloid group than colloid but these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The frequency of perioperative nausea and vomiting was also similar in both groups (p>0.05). Apgar scores of all babies were more than 7 at 1 and 5 minutes after delivery. There was no significant difference in Apgar score between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the present study concluded that there was no significant difference between crystalloid and colloid groups in development of post-spinal hypotension during caesarean section. JCMCTA 2024 ; 35 (1) : 22-27

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers Association
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v35i1.83884
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preload During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: Comparison Between Crystalloid and Colloid Solutions

Jabed Jahangir, Fatema Akter, Yasmin Ara Begum, Shahanara Chowdhury et al.
Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers Association
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Preload During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: Comparison Between Crystalloid and Colloid Solutions

Jabed Jahangir, Fatema Akter, Yasmin Ara Begum, Shahanara Chowdhury, Serajun Noor Rozy, Musarrat Naz
article en

Abstract

Background: Maternal hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery remains a major problem. Different techniques are used to counteract this deleterious effect. Different studies showed that colloid is a better preload solution in comparison to crystalloid for the prevention of post-spinal hypotension. The aim of the current study was to find the effects of volume preload with either crystalloid or colloid on changes in maternal blood pressure and neonatal outcome during elective caesarean section. Materials and and methods: This open-label Randomized clinical trial was carried out in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH) during the period January December 2017. One hundred and ten subjects, who were admitted for the elective caesarean section, were selected as per inclusion and exclusion criteria, and randomly assigned to one of the two groups after written informed consent had been obtained from each patient. Fifty-five subjects in each group received preload either with Hartman’s solution (Group A) or hydroxyethyl starch 6% (Group B) before induction of spinal anaesthesia. The incidence of hypotension (Systolic blood pressure 20% to 30% fall from baseline) and the amount of ephedrine used to treat hypotension were compared. Neonatal outcome was measured by Apgar score at 1 and at 5 minutes after delivery. Results: There was no difference in the demographic and gestational characteristics between the two groups. Baseline blood pressure was also comparable between the two groups. The sample size was 108 (53 in Group A and 55 in Group B) because 2 patients in Group A spinal induction failed. Incidence of hypotension (43.39% vs. 29.09%) and required dose of ephedrine (12.19mg vs. 10 mg) was more in the crystalloid group than colloid but these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The frequency of perioperative nausea and vomiting was also similar in both groups (p>0.05). Apgar scores of all babies were more than 7 at 1 and 5 minutes after delivery. There was no significant difference in Apgar score between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the present study concluded that there was no significant difference between crystalloid and colloid groups in development of post-spinal hypotension during caesarean section. JCMCTA 2024 ; 35 (1) : 22-27

Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers AssociationVol. 35(1)
Chittagong Medical College (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.