It Wasn't Just the Economy, Stupid: How Calvin Coolidge Won the 1924 Presidential Election

ABSTRACT President Calvin Coolidge won a landslide victory in the three‐way presidential race of 1924, against a fractured Democratic Party and Robert La Follette's Progressive insurgency. Conventional wisdom has it that Coolidge was the passive beneficiary of a strong economy and a divided opposition. After all, how could a candidate who mostly stayed silent and off the campaign trail deserve any credit for winning? This article uses qualitative and quantitative evidence to interrogate the familiar narrative about Coolidge's election. My empirical analysis confirms that Coolidge benefited from economic growth, La Follette's third‐party candidacy, and divisions within the Democratic Party. However, other factors, including the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan, also contributed to the Republican landslide. Qualitative evidence from the 1924 campaign indicates that Coolidge and the Republican Party deserve some credit for the election's outcome, given their extensive efforts to prime favorable evaluations of the national economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Presidential Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.70007
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It Wasn't Just the Economy, Stupid: How Calvin Coolidge Won the 1924 Presidential Election

Christopher J. Devine
Presidential Studies Quarterly
Race, History, and American Society
article

It Wasn't Just the Economy, Stupid: How Calvin Coolidge Won the 1924 Presidential Election

Christopher J. Devine
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT President Calvin Coolidge won a landslide victory in the three‐way presidential race of 1924, against a fractured Democratic Party and Robert La Follette's Progressive insurgency. Conventional wisdom has it that Coolidge was the passive beneficiary of a strong economy and a divided opposition. After all, how could a candidate who mostly stayed silent and off the campaign trail deserve any credit for winning? This article uses qualitative and quantitative evidence to interrogate the familiar narrative about Coolidge's election. My empirical analysis confirms that Coolidge benefited from economic growth, La Follette's third‐party candidacy, and divisions within the Democratic Party. However, other factors, including the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan, also contributed to the Republican landslide. Qualitative evidence from the 1924 campaign indicates that Coolidge and the Republican Party deserve some credit for the election's outcome, given their extensive efforts to prime favorable evaluations of the national economy.

Presidential Studies QuarterlyVol. 55(3)
University of Dayton (US)
Eli Lilly and Company
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.