Stigma Toward People With Mental Illness Among Romanian Psychiatry Trainees: A Mixed-Methods Study

Background Stigma associated with mental illness is a critical barrier to effective care, and emerging evidence suggests that stigmatizing attitudes exist even among mental health professionals. In Romania, cultural and systemic factors may exacerbate this issue, yet research examining stigma within this group is limited. This mixed-methods study investigated the attitudes and behaviors of Romanian psychiatry trainees toward individuals with mental illness, their knowledge of mental health stigma, and their perspectives on its causes and potential anti-stigma strategies. Methods Qualitative data were collected through individual interviews, and a quantitative assessment was conducted using the Mental Health Provider Stigma Inventory (MHPSI), with 20 participating trainees. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and mean differences were assessed for the total and subscale scores of the MHPSI. Results Quantitative analysis revealed moderate overall levels of stigma, with no significant differences in total or subscale scores across academic years. Statistically significant differences between males and females were observed for the total score (T(17) = 2.19, p = 0.04) and the "coworker influence" subscale (T(18) = 3.13, p = 0.002), with males scoring higher than females. Qualitative findings indicated that manifestations of stigma, such as diagnostic overshadowing and avoidance, were readily recognized among healthcare professionals. However, only a minority of psychiatry trainees acknowledged stigma in their own clinical practice, particularly in the form of judgmental attitudes and a lack of empathy. Key factors contributing to stigma included insufficient stigma education, institutional culture, and burnout. Trainees highlighted the need for targeted interventions to reduce stigma in clinical interactions. Conclusions These findings underscore that both individual and systemic factors contribute to stigma among psychiatry trainees. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive, context-specific anti-stigma interventions integrated into medical curricula and residency programs, with a focus on stigma training and reflective practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90941
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stigma Toward People With Mental Illness Among Romanian Psychiatry Trainees: A Mixed-Methods Study

Adriana Mihai, Ciprian R. Paroiu, Claire Henderson, Horia Marchean et al.
Cureus
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Stigma Toward People With Mental Illness Among Romanian Psychiatry Trainees: A Mixed-Methods Study

Adriana Mihai, Ciprian R. Paroiu, Claire Henderson, Horia Marchean, Elena Andreea Manescu, Alex C Boaca
article en

Abstract

Background Stigma associated with mental illness is a critical barrier to effective care, and emerging evidence suggests that stigmatizing attitudes exist even among mental health professionals. In Romania, cultural and systemic factors may exacerbate this issue, yet research examining stigma within this group is limited. This mixed-methods study investigated the attitudes and behaviors of Romanian psychiatry trainees toward individuals with mental illness, their knowledge of mental health stigma, and their perspectives on its causes and potential anti-stigma strategies. Methods Qualitative data were collected through individual interviews, and a quantitative assessment was conducted using the Mental Health Provider Stigma Inventory (MHPSI), with 20 participating trainees. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and mean differences were assessed for the total and subscale scores of the MHPSI. Results Quantitative analysis revealed moderate overall levels of stigma, with no significant differences in total or subscale scores across academic years. Statistically significant differences between males and females were observed for the total score (T(17) = 2.19, p = 0.04) and the "coworker influence" subscale (T(18) = 3.13, p = 0.002), with males scoring higher than females. Qualitative findings indicated that manifestations of stigma, such as diagnostic overshadowing and avoidance, were readily recognized among healthcare professionals. However, only a minority of psychiatry trainees acknowledged stigma in their own clinical practice, particularly in the form of judgmental attitudes and a lack of empathy. Key factors contributing to stigma included insufficient stigma education, institutional culture, and burnout. Trainees highlighted the need for targeted interventions to reduce stigma in clinical interactions. Conclusions These findings underscore that both individual and systemic factors contribute to stigma among psychiatry trainees. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive, context-specific anti-stigma interventions integrated into medical curricula and residency programs, with a focus on stigma training and reflective practice.

CureusVol. 17(8)
King's College London (GB), Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.