<i>Wirkungsgeschichte</i> and Jürgen Moltmann’s Theological Reception in China: A Response to Naomi Thurston

Abstract Naomi Thurston proposes the use of Gadamer’s concept Wirkungsgeschichte (Reception History) as an interpretive framework through which to analyse Chinese engagement with European theology, using Jürgen Moltmann’s theological literature as a case-study. This essay responds by discussing the underlying mechanics of Wirkungsgeschichte and Moltmann’s theological system to critically analyse whether the former does indeed serve as an appropriate lens through which to view the study and application of Moltmann’s writings in China. By identifying parallels between Moltmann’s theology of hope and the hermeneutical principles of postliberal theology, as well as Moltmann’s subversion of classical European causal explanation, the essay demonstrates the significant ways in which it actively invites international reception within the framework of Wirkungsgeschichte . Yet, the essay also argues that Gadamer’s concept raises significant limitations around the legitimacy of Chinese adoption, especially readings of Moltmann’s theology on the basis of non-Christian commitments. The essay thus concludes by posing the question whether the interdisciplinary nature of Sino-Christian theology’s reception of European works is adequately represented by Gadamer’s framework.