What drives public support and political consumerism behaviors among water-based recreationists? The case of South Carolina

Water recreationists have a unique connection to water quality, given their direct interaction with aquatic environments during leisure pursuits. Growing concerns about water quality have prompted a body of research focused on understanding how environmental conditions and risk perceptions influence environmental attitudes and conservation behaviors. Yet, the question remains—do water-based recreationists act beyond activity-specific conservation behaviors? To address this gap, this study examines whether water-based recreationists in South Carolina support stricter water management policies and participate in political consumerism behaviors (boycotting and buycotting). We collected data through survey questionnaires and employed multiple and logistic regressions for data analysis. The results showed that risk perceptions are a key driver of all three conservation behaviors. Furthermore, age appeared to be positively related to their support for water management policies, while negatively associated with boycotting and buycotting behaviors. Our findings contribute to identifying the drivers of these underexplored conservation behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2025.100940
Primary Topic
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What drives public support and political consumerism behaviors among water-based recreationists? The case of South Carolina

Lori Pennington‐Gray, Tammi L. Richardson, Mina Kim
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
article

What drives public support and political consumerism behaviors among water-based recreationists? The case of South Carolina

Lori Pennington‐Gray, Tammi L. Richardson, Mina Kim
article en

Abstract

Water recreationists have a unique connection to water quality, given their direct interaction with aquatic environments during leisure pursuits. Growing concerns about water quality have prompted a body of research focused on understanding how environmental conditions and risk perceptions influence environmental attitudes and conservation behaviors. Yet, the question remains—do water-based recreationists act beyond activity-specific conservation behaviors? To address this gap, this study examines whether water-based recreationists in South Carolina support stricter water management policies and participate in political consumerism behaviors (boycotting and buycotting). We collected data through survey questionnaires and employed multiple and logistic regressions for data analysis. The results showed that risk perceptions are a key driver of all three conservation behaviors. Furthermore, age appeared to be positively related to their support for water management policies, while negatively associated with boycotting and buycotting behaviors. Our findings contribute to identifying the drivers of these underexplored conservation behaviors.

Journal of Outdoor Recreation and TourismVol. 51
University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What drives public support and political consumerism behaviors among water-based recreationists? The case of South Carolina — Lori Pennington‐Gray, Tammi L. Richardson, et al. · Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS