Differences in Approved Doses and Drug Lag in Drugs Approved between 2012 and 2021: A Comparison between Japan and the U.S.

In recent years, multinational clinical trials (MCTs) have become a cornerstone of drug development. MCTs involve the participation of multiple regions in a single trial, with regulatory submissions based on the same trial results across all participating regions. While it is generally assumed that approved doses will align across regions, few studies have specifically analyzed the differences in approved doses between Japan and the U.S. in recent years. MCTs have been shown to reduce drug approval timing differences (drug lag) between Japan and the U.S. in certain therapeutic areas. However, data on drug lag for recently developed drugs remain limited. This study investigates differences in approved doses and drug lag between Japan and the U.S. for drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2021. The study analyzed 579 drugs with comparable dose information in Japan and the U.S., and confirmed that MCTs play a role in minimizing dose differences between Japan and the U.S. Additionally, the study confirmed that drug development through MCTs significantly shortens drug lag in these drugs, similar to previous studies with different target drugs. Overall, the findings highlight that drug development through international clinical trials not only reduces drug lag but also minimizes differences in approved doses between Japan and the U.S.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b25-00030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Approved Doses and Drug Lag in Drugs Approved between 2012 and 2021: A Comparison between Japan and the U.S.

Yoshito Abe, Kenji Onda, Kunihiko Kitagaki, Koichi Masuyama et al.
1 citations
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
3.13
article

Differences in Approved Doses and Drug Lag in Drugs Approved between 2012 and 2021: A Comparison between Japan and the U.S.

Yoshito Abe, Kenji Onda, Kunihiko Kitagaki, Koichi Masuyama, Kosuke Koyama, S Kodama, Hiroaki Yamada, Daiki Katsuta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, multinational clinical trials (MCTs) have become a cornerstone of drug development. MCTs involve the participation of multiple regions in a single trial, with regulatory submissions based on the same trial results across all participating regions. While it is generally assumed that approved doses will align across regions, few studies have specifically analyzed the differences in approved doses between Japan and the U.S. in recent years. MCTs have been shown to reduce drug approval timing differences (drug lag) between Japan and the U.S. in certain therapeutic areas. However, data on drug lag for recently developed drugs remain limited. This study investigates differences in approved doses and drug lag between Japan and the U.S. for drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2021. The study analyzed 579 drugs with comparable dose information in Japan and the U.S., and confirmed that MCTs play a role in minimizing dose differences between Japan and the U.S. Additionally, the study confirmed that drug development through MCTs significantly shortens drug lag in these drugs, similar to previous studies with different target drugs. Overall, the findings highlight that drug development through international clinical trials not only reduces drug lag but also minimizes differences in approved doses between Japan and the U.S.

Biological and Pharmaceutical BulletinVol. 48(8)
Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences (JP), Yokohama University of Pharmacy (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.