Problematicidad, reconocimiento y espiritualidad: una lectura constructiva de la resistencia política en Jan Patočka

This article discusses whether it is possible to speak in a positive sense of political resistance in Patočka, considering that in his reflections there is a clear tension regarding the power dynamics that are usually imposed to avoid it. To do this, I analyze the three movements of existence proposed by Patočka to emphasize in what sense political action can only occur in the third movement because it promotes a non-instrumental intersubjective relationship. This allows us to recognize our finitude and vulnerability and make ourselves ethically responsible for a type of non-traditional political resistance, whose interest is not to intervene in new forms of domain of life. There is, rather, a commitment to a political pluralism that does not reduce the different horizons of meaning of individuals through an effective struggle for power, but rather assumes, through the image of the spiritual man, an attitude of conversion that includes the freedom to constitute one’s own existence as a political project and, through it, a transformation of our social dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tópicos Revista de Filosofía
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v730.2980
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problematicidad, reconocimiento y espiritualidad: una lectura constructiva de la resistencia política en Jan Patočka

Adriana Pérez Cortés
Tópicos Revista de Filosofía
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

Problematicidad, reconocimiento y espiritualidad: una lectura constructiva de la resistencia política en Jan Patočka

Adriana Pérez Cortés
article en

Abstract

This article discusses whether it is possible to speak in a positive sense of political resistance in Patočka, considering that in his reflections there is a clear tension regarding the power dynamics that are usually imposed to avoid it. To do this, I analyze the three movements of existence proposed by Patočka to emphasize in what sense political action can only occur in the third movement because it promotes a non-instrumental intersubjective relationship. This allows us to recognize our finitude and vulnerability and make ourselves ethically responsible for a type of non-traditional political resistance, whose interest is not to intervene in new forms of domain of life. There is, rather, a commitment to a political pluralism that does not reduce the different horizons of meaning of individuals through an effective struggle for power, but rather assumes, through the image of the spiritual man, an attitude of conversion that includes the freedom to constitute one’s own existence as a political project and, through it, a transformation of our social dynamics.

Tópicos Revista de Filosofía(73)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Problematicidad, reconocimiento y espiritualidad: una lectura constructiva de la resistencia política en Jan Patočka — Adriana Pérez Cortés · Tópicos Revista de Filosofía (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS