Reinforcement Learning for Pmsm: Effects of Choosing a Reward Function

This paper examines the design and evaluation of reinforcement learning (RL) reward functions for permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) control in electric drive applications. Various reward structures are proposed to enhance current tracking in the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$d q$</tex>-reference frame. Unlike model predictive control, which employs a quadratic reward function for convexity and computational tractability, discontinuous reward functions yield superior performance. A comparative analysis of quadratic, absolute value, square root, and quartic root reward functions demonstrates that the quadratic scheme exhibits the poorest tracking performance-up to 32 times worse on average. While square root and quartic root yield comparable results, the absolute value function serves as an intermediate option, outperforming the quadratic scheme but falling short of the square and quartic root approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isie62713.2025.11124772
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reinforcement Learning for Pmsm: Effects of Choosing a Reward Function

J. A. Muñoz, Esin Ilhan Caarls, Jan M. Schellekens, George Papafotiou
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Reinforcement Learning for Pmsm: Effects of Choosing a Reward Function

J. A. Muñoz, Esin Ilhan Caarls, Jan M. Schellekens, George Papafotiou
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the design and evaluation of reinforcement learning (RL) reward functions for permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) control in electric drive applications. Various reward structures are proposed to enhance current tracking in the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$d q$</tex>-reference frame. Unlike model predictive control, which employs a quadratic reward function for convexity and computational tractability, discontinuous reward functions yield superior performance. A comparative analysis of quadratic, absolute value, square root, and quartic root reward functions demonstrates that the quadratic scheme exhibits the poorest tracking performance-up to 32 times worse on average. While square root and quartic root yield comparable results, the absolute value function serves as an intermediate option, outperforming the quadratic scheme but falling short of the square and quartic root approaches.

Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reinforcement Learning for Pmsm: Effects of Choosing a Reward Function — J. A. Muñoz, Esin Ilhan Caarls, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS