Unethical Academic Practices through Ethical Tools

Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools have changed the course of academic teaching and learning practices, particularly, the way of writing assessment and scholarly reports. Although the use of Artificial Intelligence based tools or similar systems is not new to academia, advanced Gen-AI tools such as Chat-GPT has opened a new path for academic misconduct. The use of Gen-AI tools forced academic institutions to adapt new policies around the use of AI generated content in assessments and research. Reputed plagiarism checking tools like Turnitin has provided AI detection mechanisms with little success, due to inconsistency in the results attributed to the quality of detection algorithms. Tools like ZeroGPT, Originality.ai, GPTZero, etc., are exclusively developed for detecting AI generated content. However, at present, some Gen-AI based companies like StealthAI, AIHumanizer etc., are offering services that can be used to evade detection tools for plagiarism. These services use advanced algorithms and techniques to identify patterns and rewrite the content to mimic human styled text. This posed serious challenges in identifying academic misconduct. This research explores various tools that learners use or can be used in assessments and research that can evade AI and plagiarism detection. A list of 6 reputed tools like StealthAI, AIHumanizer, ByPassGPT are reviewed to identify how these tools evade AI detection. The problem of academic misconduct is critically evaluated using literature, and the practical implications of misconduct are presented. As this ongoing research is closely aligned with learner abilities, the impact of Gen-AI is presented through the lenses of learners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/istem-ed65612.2025.11129384
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unethical Academic Practices through Ethical Tools

Ushik Shrestha Khwakhali, Sreenivas Sremath Tirumala
Ethics in medical practice
article

Unethical Academic Practices through Ethical Tools

Ushik Shrestha Khwakhali, Sreenivas Sremath Tirumala
article en

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools have changed the course of academic teaching and learning practices, particularly, the way of writing assessment and scholarly reports. Although the use of Artificial Intelligence based tools or similar systems is not new to academia, advanced Gen-AI tools such as Chat-GPT has opened a new path for academic misconduct. The use of Gen-AI tools forced academic institutions to adapt new policies around the use of AI generated content in assessments and research. Reputed plagiarism checking tools like Turnitin has provided AI detection mechanisms with little success, due to inconsistency in the results attributed to the quality of detection algorithms. Tools like ZeroGPT, Originality.ai, GPTZero, etc., are exclusively developed for detecting AI generated content. However, at present, some Gen-AI based companies like StealthAI, AIHumanizer etc., are offering services that can be used to evade detection tools for plagiarism. These services use advanced algorithms and techniques to identify patterns and rewrite the content to mimic human styled text. This posed serious challenges in identifying academic misconduct. This research explores various tools that learners use or can be used in assessments and research that can evade AI and plagiarism detection. A list of 6 reputed tools like StealthAI, AIHumanizer, ByPassGPT are reviewed to identify how these tools evade AI detection. The problem of academic misconduct is critically evaluated using literature, and the practical implications of misconduct are presented. As this ongoing research is closely aligned with learner abilities, the impact of Gen-AI is presented through the lenses of learners.

RMIT Vietnam (VN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.