Evaluation of Classical and Reinforcement Learning Controllers for Motor Drives

This paper presents an analysis of reinforcement learning (RL) controllers for power converters applied in motor drives. A comparison between a classical proportional-integrative controller (PI), a finite control-set model predictive controller (FCS-MPC) and two reinforcement learning controllers is performed. These reinforcement learning techniques are: the Deep Q-network (DQN) and the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). An internal permanent magnet synchronous machine (IPMSM) is considered for evaluation of the four controllers. The mathematical theory of the neural networks training is presented, along with an analysis of the reward function applied to find the optimal control action. Simulation results are presented to show a detailed steady-state and transient analysis and comparison of the four control techniques evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isie62713.2025.11124765
Primary Topic
Iterative Learning Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Classical and Reinforcement Learning Controllers for Motor Drives

Akash Samanta, Cassiano Rech, Sheldon S. Williamson, William K. Moreira
Iterative Learning Control Systems
article

Evaluation of Classical and Reinforcement Learning Controllers for Motor Drives

Akash Samanta, Cassiano Rech, Sheldon S. Williamson, William K. Moreira
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of reinforcement learning (RL) controllers for power converters applied in motor drives. A comparison between a classical proportional-integrative controller (PI), a finite control-set model predictive controller (FCS-MPC) and two reinforcement learning controllers is performed. These reinforcement learning techniques are: the Deep Q-network (DQN) and the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). An internal permanent magnet synchronous machine (IPMSM) is considered for evaluation of the four controllers. The mathematical theory of the neural networks training is presented, along with an analysis of the reward function applied to find the optimal control action. Simulation results are presented to show a detailed steady-state and transient analysis and comparison of the four control techniques evaluated.

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), Ontario Tech University (CA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Iterative Learning Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.