Remote Healthcare Monitoring Architecture for Diabetes Patients Using Logistic Regression in Comparison Support Vector Machine for Improving Precision

The purpose of this project is to monitor remote healthcare and assist individuals with diabetes in making diabetic predictions. This study is divided into two groups. While the second group created a Support Vector Machine using 104 samples, the first group developed a Logistic Regression approach. With a Support Vector Machine (N = 52) and G power (value = 0.8) sampling approach, the sample size for Logistic Regression is 52. The Logistic Regression algorithm's accuracy is said to be 93%, whilst the Support Vector Machine Method's accuracy has been improved to 95%. The results of an independent sample T test indicated that the hypothesis is true and that the test is performed with an independent sample T test. The mean value was 93.2800, the mean accuracy detection was ±2SD, and the significance value was 0.000 (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p&lt;0.05$</tex>). It was found that the end result of the Support Vector Machine Approach, 95%, was significantly more accurate than the Logistic Regression approach, 93%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120065
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote Healthcare Monitoring Architecture for Diabetes Patients Using Logistic Regression in Comparison Support Vector Machine for Improving Precision

M. Naren, A. P. Senthil Kumar, Obli Prakash PC
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Remote Healthcare Monitoring Architecture for Diabetes Patients Using Logistic Regression in Comparison Support Vector Machine for Improving Precision

M. Naren, A. P. Senthil Kumar, Obli Prakash PC
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this project is to monitor remote healthcare and assist individuals with diabetes in making diabetic predictions. This study is divided into two groups. While the second group created a Support Vector Machine using 104 samples, the first group developed a Logistic Regression approach. With a Support Vector Machine (N = 52) and G power (value = 0.8) sampling approach, the sample size for Logistic Regression is 52. The Logistic Regression algorithm's accuracy is said to be 93%, whilst the Support Vector Machine Method's accuracy has been improved to 95%. The results of an independent sample T test indicated that the hypothesis is true and that the test is performed with an independent sample T test. The mean value was 93.2800, the mean accuracy detection was ±2SD, and the significance value was 0.000 (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p&lt;0.05$</tex>). It was found that the end result of the Support Vector Machine Approach, 95%, was significantly more accurate than the Logistic Regression approach, 93%.

Jigjiga University (ET), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.