Efficient Predictive Analysis for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Network Compared Over Convolutional Neural Network with Better Accuracy

This research focused on comparing the effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for intrusion detection. Using a sample size of 10 for each network type, the study aimed to determine which algorithm offers better accuracy. The RNN, which uses multiple “trees” for classification-where each tree votes on the final decision-was tested for its accuracy in detecting intrusions. The analysis involved a pretest power calculation with 80 % power and a 95 % confidence interval, with 10 iterations for each method. The results showed that RNN achieved an accuracy of 97.46 %, while CNN achieved 93.12 %. Although the statistical test indicated no significant difference between the two methods (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p=0.428; p&lt;0.05$</tex>), the RNN still demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy. Overall, the study concludes that the RNN is a more effective and faster algorithm for building machine learning models for intrusion detection compared to CNN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11120168
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient Predictive Analysis for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Network Compared Over Convolutional Neural Network with Better Accuracy

Ranjit Singh, M Geethanjali, S. Saraswathi, B. Pavan
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Efficient Predictive Analysis for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Network Compared Over Convolutional Neural Network with Better Accuracy

Ranjit Singh, M Geethanjali, S. Saraswathi, B. Pavan
article en

Abstract

This research focused on comparing the effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for intrusion detection. Using a sample size of 10 for each network type, the study aimed to determine which algorithm offers better accuracy. The RNN, which uses multiple “trees” for classification-where each tree votes on the final decision-was tested for its accuracy in detecting intrusions. The analysis involved a pretest power calculation with 80 % power and a 95 % confidence interval, with 10 iterations for each method. The results showed that RNN achieved an accuracy of 97.46 %, while CNN achieved 93.12 %. Although the statistical test indicated no significant difference between the two methods (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p=0.428; p&lt;0.05$</tex>), the RNN still demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy. Overall, the study concludes that the RNN is a more effective and faster algorithm for building machine learning models for intrusion detection compared to CNN.

Sunway University (MY), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.