Evaluating Traffic Flow Prediction Accuracy Using Support Vector Machines and Feedforward Neural Networks

SVM's predicting accuracy for traffic flow in comparison to FeedForward neural networks. The extensive nonlinearity of the site visitors flow is too complex for the existing methodologies to accurately estimate short-term traffic flow, resulting in subpar prediction accuracy. In this research, we propose an absolutely mannequin based on deep learning that uses multiple-layer architectures and novel hybrid approaches to automatically identify fundamental components of traffic flow data. The train dataset evaluation and look at the dataset have been completed successfully. Compared to the FeedForward Neural Network, which has an accuracy of 94.28%, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) is 97.99% more accurate. < 0.001 statistical significance <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(p&lt;0.05)$</tex>. The groupings are statistically significant, according to the data. In conclusion, Support Vector Machine outperforms the FeedForward Neural Network algorithm in traffic flow and speed forecasting predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetas62372.2024.11119969
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Traffic Flow Prediction Accuracy Using Support Vector Machines and Feedforward Neural Networks

J. Gayathri, Maheswara Reddy, K. Sashirekha, Crecent Boniface Sembuli
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
article

Evaluating Traffic Flow Prediction Accuracy Using Support Vector Machines and Feedforward Neural Networks

J. Gayathri, Maheswara Reddy, K. Sashirekha, Crecent Boniface Sembuli
article en

Abstract

SVM's predicting accuracy for traffic flow in comparison to FeedForward neural networks. The extensive nonlinearity of the site visitors flow is too complex for the existing methodologies to accurately estimate short-term traffic flow, resulting in subpar prediction accuracy. In this research, we propose an absolutely mannequin based on deep learning that uses multiple-layer architectures and novel hybrid approaches to automatically identify fundamental components of traffic flow data. The train dataset evaluation and look at the dataset have been completed successfully. Compared to the FeedForward Neural Network, which has an accuracy of 94.28%, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) is 97.99% more accurate. < 0.001 statistical significance <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(p&lt;0.05)$</tex>. The groupings are statistically significant, according to the data. In conclusion, Support Vector Machine outperforms the FeedForward Neural Network algorithm in traffic flow and speed forecasting predictions.

University of Arusha (TZ), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Traffic Flow Prediction Accuracy Using Support Vector Machines and Feedforward Neural Networks — J. Gayathri, Maheswara Reddy, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS