Machine learning-based full-life-cycle seismic response assessment for in-service bridge piers: Comprehensive analysis of interpretability and seismic fragility

Accurate assessment of seismic responses is essential for post-earthquake damage classification and rapid rescue efforts. To facilitate efficient prediction of the seismic response of bridge piers and guide seismic design, this study developed a machine learning (ML)-based model for evaluating the seismic behavior of in-service bridge piers. The models provided precise predictions of the maximum drift ratio (MDR) and residual drift ratio (RDR) of in-service bridge piers subjected to seismic loading using 22 input features. To effectively train the ML model, a comprehensive database was developed by performing detailed batch analysis on numerical models of a complex set of in-service bridge piers. Based on interpretability techniques, the study identified and examined the key factors and mechanisms influencing bridge pier seismic responses. The results indicate that the GBM model is the optimal model for predicting the maximum seismic response, while the CatBoost model is the optimal model for estimating the residual seismic response of bridge piers. earthquake information and structural dimensions contribute to over 75 % of the variation in seismic responses, making them the dominant factors influencing bridge pier seismic damage. Preventing shear failure, adjusting bridge pier cross-sectional dimensions, and increasing the diameter of transverse reinforcement are the primary strategies to mitigate seismic response and prevent severe structural damage. Furthermore, a hybrid ML model was employed to conduct seismic fragility analysis, validating its applicability in the assessment of seismic performance. The findings provide valuable insights for rapid seismic damage prediction and improvements in seismic design for in-service bridge structures in coastal areas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Structures
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110050
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning-based full-life-cycle seismic response assessment for in-service bridge piers: Comprehensive analysis of interpretability and seismic fragility

Yalin Li, Zhen Sun, Xu Xue, Sujith Mangalathu et al.
20 citations
Structures
Seismic Performance and Analysis
19.06
article

Machine learning-based full-life-cycle seismic response assessment for in-service bridge piers: Comprehensive analysis of interpretability and seismic fragility

Yalin Li, Zhen Sun, Xu Xue, Sujith Mangalathu, Weidong He, Yaqi Li
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Accurate assessment of seismic responses is essential for post-earthquake damage classification and rapid rescue efforts. To facilitate efficient prediction of the seismic response of bridge piers and guide seismic design, this study developed a machine learning (ML)-based model for evaluating the seismic behavior of in-service bridge piers. The models provided precise predictions of the maximum drift ratio (MDR) and residual drift ratio (RDR) of in-service bridge piers subjected to seismic loading using 22 input features. To effectively train the ML model, a comprehensive database was developed by performing detailed batch analysis on numerical models of a complex set of in-service bridge piers. Based on interpretability techniques, the study identified and examined the key factors and mechanisms influencing bridge pier seismic responses. The results indicate that the GBM model is the optimal model for predicting the maximum seismic response, while the CatBoost model is the optimal model for estimating the residual seismic response of bridge piers. earthquake information and structural dimensions contribute to over 75 % of the variation in seismic responses, making them the dominant factors influencing bridge pier seismic damage. Preventing shear failure, adjusting bridge pier cross-sectional dimensions, and increasing the diameter of transverse reinforcement are the primary strategies to mitigate seismic response and prevent severe structural damage. Furthermore, a hybrid ML model was employed to conduct seismic fragility analysis, validating its applicability in the assessment of seismic performance. The findings provide valuable insights for rapid seismic damage prediction and improvements in seismic design for in-service bridge structures in coastal areas.

StructuresVol. 80
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
19.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine learning-based full-life-cycle seismic response assessment for in-service bridge piers: Comprehensive analysis of interpretability and seismic fragility — Yalin Li, Zhen Sun, et al. · Structures (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS