Material Evaluation and Selection Criteria for 3D Printing

3D printing has emerged as the primary additive manufacturing technology, widelyutilized across industries in the past decade for its design flexibility, material efficiency, andrapid prototyping. FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) stands out among 3D printing techniquesfor its use of reliable polymeric filaments, offering advantages like lightweight and cost-effectiveness. Despite the advantages of FDM, the abundance of filament materials in themarket poses challenges in material selection to 3D printer users, that is which should beselected, and what should be the criteria to base. This research project is targeted to establishmaterial selection criteria for 3D printing, demonstrates that filament material selection shouldbe driven by the function of the printing object. The project endeavors to evaluate the propertiesof four major filaments available in the market, choosing a biomimetic hand as the final printingobject. We identify suitable materials to be used to print each part of the biometric hand.Through experiments, we tested tensile creep, wear resistance, chemical solvent resistance anddensity of printing from the four filaments. We select Polylactic Acid (PLA) to make the 14phalanges bones due to its high wear resistance and compromise well on other properties;select Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG) to make the 5 metacarpal bones mostly dueto its high creep performance; select Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) to make the 8 piecescarpal bones. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) is ruled out due to low chemical resistance,and not suitable for biochemistry environments. Filament selection in 3D printing shouldconsider material’s property which can best benefit the object’s function and duration,sometimes may compromise.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Student Research
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8995
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material Evaluation and Selection Criteria for 3D Printing

Sridhar Kota, Lihua Yang
Journal of Student Research
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Material Evaluation and Selection Criteria for 3D Printing

Sridhar Kota, Lihua Yang
article en

Abstract

3D printing has emerged as the primary additive manufacturing technology, widelyutilized across industries in the past decade for its design flexibility, material efficiency, andrapid prototyping. FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) stands out among 3D printing techniquesfor its use of reliable polymeric filaments, offering advantages like lightweight and cost-effectiveness. Despite the advantages of FDM, the abundance of filament materials in themarket poses challenges in material selection to 3D printer users, that is which should beselected, and what should be the criteria to base. This research project is targeted to establishmaterial selection criteria for 3D printing, demonstrates that filament material selection shouldbe driven by the function of the printing object. The project endeavors to evaluate the propertiesof four major filaments available in the market, choosing a biomimetic hand as the final printingobject. We identify suitable materials to be used to print each part of the biometric hand.Through experiments, we tested tensile creep, wear resistance, chemical solvent resistance anddensity of printing from the four filaments. We select Polylactic Acid (PLA) to make the 14phalanges bones due to its high wear resistance and compromise well on other properties;select Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG) to make the 5 metacarpal bones mostly dueto its high creep performance; select Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) to make the 8 piecescarpal bones. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) is ruled out due to low chemical resistance,and not suitable for biochemistry environments. Filament selection in 3D printing shouldconsider material’s property which can best benefit the object’s function and duration,sometimes may compromise.

Journal of Student ResearchVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.