Hawks and Doves: Financial market perception of Western support for Ukraine

Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the West has been intensively discussing its support strategy. Hawkish positions of strengthening Ukraine via armaments, financial resources, and sanctions against Russia compete with dovish views of avoiding further escalation of the military and geopolitical conflict. We analyse how international financial markets perceived this news. We create a comprehensive data set of news related to the early phase of the war and measure reactions of five key financial markets. The results show that stronger support for Ukraine had a positive impact after the first weeks of the war when the Ukrainian position in the war improved, but a negative (or at least less positive) influence before. Thus, financial markets seem to have perceived support as a risk of further escalation threatening business prospects in the first phase. However, a hawkish line was a positive signal for financial markets after the change in perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Economy
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102744
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hawks and Doves: Financial market perception of Western support for Ukraine

Maria Repko, Enzo Weber, Matthias Neuenkirch
1 citations
European Journal of Political Economy
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
article

Hawks and Doves: Financial market perception of Western support for Ukraine

Maria Repko, Enzo Weber, Matthias Neuenkirch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the West has been intensively discussing its support strategy. Hawkish positions of strengthening Ukraine via armaments, financial resources, and sanctions against Russia compete with dovish views of avoiding further escalation of the military and geopolitical conflict. We analyse how international financial markets perceived this news. We create a comprehensive data set of news related to the early phase of the war and measure reactions of five key financial markets. The results show that stronger support for Ukraine had a positive impact after the first weeks of the war when the Ukrainian position in the war improved, but a negative (or at least less positive) influence before. Thus, financial markets seem to have perceived support as a risk of further escalation threatening business prospects in the first phase. However, a hawkish line was a positive signal for financial markets after the change in perceptions.

European Journal of Political EconomyVol. 89
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (DE), The National Institute for Strategic Studies (UA), Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies (DE), University of Regensburg (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.