Trade with Nominal Rigidities: Understanding the Unemployment and Welfare Effects of the China Shock

We present a dynamic quantitative trade and migration model that incorporates downward nominal wage rigidities and show how this framework can generate changes in unemployment and labor participation that match those uncovered by the empirical literature studying the “China shock.” We find that the China shock leads to average welfare increases in most U.S. states, including many that experience unemployment during the transition. However, nominal rigidities reduce the overall U.S. gains by around two thirds. In addition, there are 18 states that experience welfare losses in the presence of downward nominal wage rigidity that would have experienced gains without it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/738344
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade with Nominal Rigidities: Understanding the Unemployment and Welfare Effects of the China Shock

Mauricio Ulate, Jose P. Vasquez, Andrés Rodrı́guez-Clare
1 citations
Journal of Political Economy
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Trade with Nominal Rigidities: Understanding the Unemployment and Welfare Effects of the China Shock

Mauricio Ulate, Jose P. Vasquez, Andrés Rodrı́guez-Clare
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present a dynamic quantitative trade and migration model that incorporates downward nominal wage rigidities and show how this framework can generate changes in unemployment and labor participation that match those uncovered by the empirical literature studying the “China shock.” We find that the China shock leads to average welfare increases in most U.S. states, including many that experience unemployment during the transition. However, nominal rigidities reduce the overall U.S. gains by around two thirds. In addition, there are 18 states that experience welfare losses in the presence of downward nominal wage rigidity that would have experienced gains without it.

Journal of Political EconomyVol. 134(2)
National Science Foundation
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.