Socio-cultural patterns in how residents value and use green space in new greenfield developments

Understanding green space values and interactions in greenfield residential estates is crucial for urban planning, yet there is a distinct lack of research on how these culturally diverse, new communities interact with green spaces such as parks and private gardens. This study examines how socio-cultural factors and nature values influence residents’ interactions with green spaces in these new developments. We conducted an online survey of people living in recently developed greenfield estates across three capital cities in Southeast Australia ( n = 1041). The survey assessed core nature values and valued attributes of private and public green spaces, visitation frequency of parks and backyards, life satisfaction and nature connection. Respondents also indicated preferences for house and backyard size (keeping land parcel area constant) of a hypothetical future home. Our findings reveal specific socio-cultural differences in values and green space interactions. In our sample, women value social attributes of green spaces more than men, and older people spend more time in private green spaces and value natural attributes of public green space more than younger people. Green space visits were positively associated with nature connection and life satisfaction, but different nature values related to these outcomes in contrasting ways. Notably, 49% of respondents preferred a smaller home and corresponding larger backyard, when asked about moving into a new home. The results suggest that green spaces in greenfield developments should be designed to maintain a natural landscape while supporting recreation and social interactions. They also emphasise that there is demand for smaller house footprints relative to residential block sizes which could have substantial benefits for urban sustainability. • We explore greenfield residents’ values and interactions with green space • We integrate socio-cultural factors, nature values and green space interactions • Large survey cohort from Melbourne, Sydney, and Adelaide, Australia • Nature values are linked to nature connection and life satisfaction in contrasting ways • 49% of respondents would prefer a smaller house with a larger backyard • Green space visits are positively associated with nature connection and wellbeing

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129030
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-cultural patterns in how residents value and use green space in new greenfield developments

Nicholas S. G. Williams, Amy K. Hahs, Stéphanie Lavau, Rose Macaulay
Urban forestry & urban greening
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Socio-cultural patterns in how residents value and use green space in new greenfield developments

Nicholas S. G. Williams, Amy K. Hahs, Stéphanie Lavau, Rose Macaulay
article en

Abstract

Understanding green space values and interactions in greenfield residential estates is crucial for urban planning, yet there is a distinct lack of research on how these culturally diverse, new communities interact with green spaces such as parks and private gardens. This study examines how socio-cultural factors and nature values influence residents’ interactions with green spaces in these new developments. We conducted an online survey of people living in recently developed greenfield estates across three capital cities in Southeast Australia ( n = 1041). The survey assessed core nature values and valued attributes of private and public green spaces, visitation frequency of parks and backyards, life satisfaction and nature connection. Respondents also indicated preferences for house and backyard size (keeping land parcel area constant) of a hypothetical future home. Our findings reveal specific socio-cultural differences in values and green space interactions. In our sample, women value social attributes of green spaces more than men, and older people spend more time in private green spaces and value natural attributes of public green space more than younger people. Green space visits were positively associated with nature connection and life satisfaction, but different nature values related to these outcomes in contrasting ways. Notably, 49% of respondents preferred a smaller home and corresponding larger backyard, when asked about moving into a new home. The results suggest that green spaces in greenfield developments should be designed to maintain a natural landscape while supporting recreation and social interactions. They also emphasise that there is demand for smaller house footprints relative to residential block sizes which could have substantial benefits for urban sustainability. • We explore greenfield residents’ values and interactions with green space • We integrate socio-cultural factors, nature values and green space interactions • Large survey cohort from Melbourne, Sydney, and Adelaide, Australia • Nature values are linked to nature connection and life satisfaction in contrasting ways • 49% of respondents would prefer a smaller house with a larger backyard • Green space visits are positively associated with nature connection and wellbeing

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 113
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.