Corporate Pension Risk Transfers

Sponsors of corporate defined benefit (DB) pension plans in the United States transferred $155 billion pension obligations to insurance companies between 2012 and 2022. These pension risk transfers (PRTs) reduced the pool of corporate DB plan participants by 12% and are a huge business for the involved insurers. We assemble a new PRT database and highlight three features of PRTs: (i) the burden associated with mandatory Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) insurance premiums drives PRT activity; (ii) using an upper bound measure for the impact of PRTs, we estimate that the average sponsor reduces its pension obligations and plan participants by 22% and 27%, respectively. These large reductions are mainly because of the transfer of retired plan participants to insurance companies. (iii) Plan sponsors that conduct PRTs have less default risk and less volatile pension assets even after conducting the PRTs. Hence, PRTs increase the risk of the remaining PBGC pool. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Funding: S. Klingler gratefully acknowledges support from the European Research Council [Grant 101040188]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05523 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05523
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Pension Risk Transfers

Sven Klingler, Suresh Sundaresan, Michael Moran
1 citations
Management Science
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
3.91
article

Corporate Pension Risk Transfers

Sven Klingler, Suresh Sundaresan, Michael Moran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sponsors of corporate defined benefit (DB) pension plans in the United States transferred $155 billion pension obligations to insurance companies between 2012 and 2022. These pension risk transfers (PRTs) reduced the pool of corporate DB plan participants by 12% and are a huge business for the involved insurers. We assemble a new PRT database and highlight three features of PRTs: (i) the burden associated with mandatory Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) insurance premiums drives PRT activity; (ii) using an upper bound measure for the impact of PRTs, we estimate that the average sponsor reduces its pension obligations and plan participants by 22% and 27%, respectively. These large reductions are mainly because of the transfer of retired plan participants to insurance companies. (iii) Plan sponsors that conduct PRTs have less default risk and less volatile pension assets even after conducting the PRTs. Hence, PRTs increase the risk of the remaining PBGC pool. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Funding: S. Klingler gratefully acknowledges support from the European Research Council [Grant 101040188]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05523 .

Management Science
Goldman Sachs (United States) (US), Frankfurt School of Finance & Management (DE), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate Pension Risk Transfers — Sven Klingler, Suresh Sundaresan, et al. · Management Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS