Understanding the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with Huntington's disease

BackgroundGiven the progressive cognitive decline in Huntington's disease (HD), most research in this population relies solely on objective assessments of symptoms and function, rather than on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper is to understand how PRO measures relate to clinician-rated assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with HD.MethodsWe enrolled N = 52 participants with HD in this study. Participants completed several self-reported PROs as well as clinician-administered assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of related concepts. Pearson correlations and linear regression models were used to examine the concordance among PROs, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures.ResultsThere were strong relationships among PROs that assessed related concepts. There were also strong relationships between PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments of physical functioning (chorea, sleep/fatigue) and mental health, and slightly less robust relationships between the PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments for speech/swallowing and cognition. Relationships between PROs and associated performance-based measures were moderate for chorea/motor functioning, but negligible for sleep/fatigue and cognition.ConclusionsFindings from this study support the construct validity of PROs that assess motor functioning and mental health among individuals with HD and indicate that PROs and clinician-rated assessments of these constructs (i.e., motor functioning and mental health) provide complementary information. On the other hand, the negligible relationships between PROs and associated performance-based cognitive tests and between PROs and associated wearable device-based estimates of sleep and physical activity indicate that reliance solely on HD patients' self-report for these concepts might be misleading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Huntington s Disease
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18796397251366313
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with Huntington's disease

Jennifer Ann Miner, Praveen Dayalu, Noelle E. Carlozzi, Jonathan P. Troost et al.
1 citations
Journal of Huntington s Disease
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
0.91
article

Understanding the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with Huntington's disease

Jennifer Ann Miner, Praveen Dayalu, Noelle E. Carlozzi, Jonathan P. Troost, Wendy L Lombard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundGiven the progressive cognitive decline in Huntington's disease (HD), most research in this population relies solely on objective assessments of symptoms and function, rather than on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper is to understand how PRO measures relate to clinician-rated assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with HD.MethodsWe enrolled N = 52 participants with HD in this study. Participants completed several self-reported PROs as well as clinician-administered assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of related concepts. Pearson correlations and linear regression models were used to examine the concordance among PROs, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures.ResultsThere were strong relationships among PROs that assessed related concepts. There were also strong relationships between PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments of physical functioning (chorea, sleep/fatigue) and mental health, and slightly less robust relationships between the PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments for speech/swallowing and cognition. Relationships between PROs and associated performance-based measures were moderate for chorea/motor functioning, but negligible for sleep/fatigue and cognition.ConclusionsFindings from this study support the construct validity of PROs that assess motor functioning and mental health among individuals with HD and indicate that PROs and clinician-rated assessments of these constructs (i.e., motor functioning and mental health) provide complementary information. On the other hand, the negligible relationships between PROs and associated performance-based cognitive tests and between PROs and associated wearable device-based estimates of sleep and physical activity indicate that reliance solely on HD patients' self-report for these concepts might be misleading.

Journal of Huntington s DiseaseVol. 14(4)
University of Michigan (US)
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
0.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.