Comparison of the Physicochemical Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Decaffeinated Coffee Capsules

In this study, 10 types of domestically and internationally available decaffeinated coffee capsules were compared and analyzed to evaluate the differences in the quality and activity of each product.The samples were extracted as 40 mL espressos using a capsule coffee machine under the same conditions, and the physicochemical properties, including color, total dissolved solids, and pH, were measured.Additionally, antioxidant activities were assessed by evaluating the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging abilities, and the total phenol and flavonoid contents were determined.The analysis revealed that the DPPH radical scavenging ability ranged from 49.880.62% to 60.621.50%,and the ABTS radical scavenging ability ranged from 63.541.97% to 89.481.12%,showing significant variation among the samples.Caffeine content varied from 0.09 mg/mL to 0.18 mg/mL, indicating considerable differences in product quality despite the same decaffeinated labeling.Moreover, a strong positive correlation between the flavonoid and total phenol content was observed (r=0.95), while a negative correlation was found between DPPH radical scavenging activity and pH (r=-0.87).These findings suggest that differences in the quality and activity of decaffeinated coffee capsules exist between products, which could significantly influence consumer choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2025.54.8.688
Primary Topic
Freezing and Crystallization Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Physicochemical Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Decaffeinated Coffee Capsules

Inyong Kim, Sinyoung Park, Shuibing Yang
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
Freezing and Crystallization Processes
article

Comparison of the Physicochemical Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Decaffeinated Coffee Capsules

Inyong Kim, Sinyoung Park, Shuibing Yang
article en

Abstract

In this study, 10 types of domestically and internationally available decaffeinated coffee capsules were compared and analyzed to evaluate the differences in the quality and activity of each product.The samples were extracted as 40 mL espressos using a capsule coffee machine under the same conditions, and the physicochemical properties, including color, total dissolved solids, and pH, were measured.Additionally, antioxidant activities were assessed by evaluating the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging abilities, and the total phenol and flavonoid contents were determined.The analysis revealed that the DPPH radical scavenging ability ranged from 49.880.62% to 60.621.50%,and the ABTS radical scavenging ability ranged from 63.541.97% to 89.481.12%,showing significant variation among the samples.Caffeine content varied from 0.09 mg/mL to 0.18 mg/mL, indicating considerable differences in product quality despite the same decaffeinated labeling.Moreover, a strong positive correlation between the flavonoid and total phenol content was observed (r=0.95), while a negative correlation was found between DPPH radical scavenging activity and pH (r=-0.87).These findings suggest that differences in the quality and activity of decaffeinated coffee capsules exist between products, which could significantly influence consumer choice.

Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and NutritionVol. 54(8)
Sunchon National University (KR), Food & Nutrition (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Freezing and Crystallization Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.