The US Public’s Views of Paradiplomacy, 1988–2024

Abstract US state and local governments engage in many activities involving foreign relations, from officials’ trips abroad to maintaining offices to promote trade and investment to passing resolutions about foreign policy. Yet we know little about what the public thinks about these activities. I report on a 2024 survey of Americans’ paradiplomacy views that updates a 1988 poll conducted by the federal Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. I find increased support for paradiplomatic activities, but I also find that the degree of support varies by activities’ objective, demographic characteristics, and partisan identity. Gubernatorial and mayoral travel for cultural or economic purposes elicits less opposition than climate-related trips. Urban respondents view city council resolutions on international activities more favorably than suburban or rural residents. Republicans generally support subnational international engagement less than Democrats. These data illuminate the domestic opportunity structures influencing US subnational governments’ external activities and open new lines of inquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publius The Journal of Federalism
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The US Public’s Views of Paradiplomacy, 1988–2024

Paul Musgrave
1 citations
Publius The Journal of Federalism
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
8.52
article

The US Public’s Views of Paradiplomacy, 1988–2024

Paul Musgrave
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract US state and local governments engage in many activities involving foreign relations, from officials’ trips abroad to maintaining offices to promote trade and investment to passing resolutions about foreign policy. Yet we know little about what the public thinks about these activities. I report on a 2024 survey of Americans’ paradiplomacy views that updates a 1988 poll conducted by the federal Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. I find increased support for paradiplomatic activities, but I also find that the degree of support varies by activities’ objective, demographic characteristics, and partisan identity. Gubernatorial and mayoral travel for cultural or economic purposes elicits less opposition than climate-related trips. Urban respondents view city council resolutions on international activities more favorably than suburban or rural residents. Republicans generally support subnational international engagement less than Democrats. These data illuminate the domestic opportunity structures influencing US subnational governments’ external activities and open new lines of inquiry.

Publius The Journal of Federalism
Georgetown University in Qatar (QA)
Georgetown University, Qatar National Library
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The US Public’s Views of Paradiplomacy, 1988–2024 — Paul Musgrave · Publius The Journal of Federalism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS