Black Box AI and the Sovereignty of Personal Data: Between GDPR and Digital Ethics

The emergence of Black Box artificial intelligence poses fundamental challenges to data protection law, particularly with regard to digital sovereignty and the application of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These algorithmic systems, defined by their lack of transparency and the inability to explain automated decisions, significantly hinder the exercise of guaranteed rights such as data access, objection, and the right to contest automated decisions. Although the GDPR enshrines the principle of transparency and imposes clear obligations on data controllers, opaque AI systems jeopardize the informational autonomy of individuals. The CJEU ruling in the Nowak case reinforces the right to understand the decision-making logic of AI, but practical implementation remains difficult due to trade secret protections. In this context, an expanded legal framework is necessary—one that integrates explainability requirements and ethical accountability to ensure a balance between innovation and the protection of fundamental rights. Furthermore, the distinction between formal transparency and substantive explainability becomes critical in guaranteeing individuals' effective control over the data and decisions that affect them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Law and Public Administration
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.1/258
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Black Box AI and the Sovereignty of Personal Data: Between GDPR and Digital Ethics

Andreea Buruiană
European Journal of Law and Public Administration
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Black Box AI and the Sovereignty of Personal Data: Between GDPR and Digital Ethics

Andreea Buruiană
article en

Abstract

The emergence of Black Box artificial intelligence poses fundamental challenges to data protection law, particularly with regard to digital sovereignty and the application of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These algorithmic systems, defined by their lack of transparency and the inability to explain automated decisions, significantly hinder the exercise of guaranteed rights such as data access, objection, and the right to contest automated decisions. Although the GDPR enshrines the principle of transparency and imposes clear obligations on data controllers, opaque AI systems jeopardize the informational autonomy of individuals. The CJEU ruling in the Nowak case reinforces the right to understand the decision-making logic of AI, but practical implementation remains difficult due to trade secret protections. In this context, an expanded legal framework is necessary—one that integrates explainability requirements and ethical accountability to ensure a balance between innovation and the protection of fundamental rights. Furthermore, the distinction between formal transparency and substantive explainability becomes critical in guaranteeing individuals' effective control over the data and decisions that affect them.

European Journal of Law and Public AdministrationVol. 12(1)
Titu Maiorescu University (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Black Box AI and the Sovereignty of Personal Data: Between GDPR and Digital Ethics — Andreea Buruiană · European Journal of Law and Public Administration (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS