Hydrological insights from a comparative evaluation of LSTM and MC-LSTM networks in the Ebro River basin (Spain)

The northern part of the Ebro River basin, Spain. Deep learning techniques are transforming streamflow modelling by delivering state-of-the-art predictions despite persistent challenges in interpretability and adherence to physical laws. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the standard Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network alongside its physically constrained variant, the Mass-Conserving LSTM (MC-LSTM), across multiple training scenarios applied to gauging stations in the Ebro River Basin (Spain). In addition to traditional metrics such as the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), our analysis uniquely disaggregates model performance by quantifying peak magnitude errors through normalized RMSE values stratified by specific return periods (T 0.5 , T 1 , T 2 , T 5 , T 10 ) and by assessing time delay errors using a wavelet coherence approach to capture temporal differences between observed and predicted discharge records. Our results indicate that while the regional LSTM model excels in predicting low and medium magnitude flows with accurate timing, its performance in modelling flood peaks is mixed. In contrast, the MC-LSTM model, leveraging its mass balance constraint as a regularization mechanism, demonstrates superior detection of high-magnitude events but exhibits distinct time lag characteristics. This integrated evaluation framework provides comprehensive insights into both the magnitude and temporal accuracy of deep learning hydrological models, underscoring the potential of incorporating physical constraints to achieve more robust and interpretable flood modelling. • Peak flow errors are evaluated using normalized RMSE for different return periods. • The MC-LSTM model shows excellent performance in flood predictions tasks. • Traditional LSTM models provide improved estimates of peak streamflow timing. • Sequence length selection is linked to dominant streamflow temporal dynamics. • The physical constraint in MC-LSTM improves generalization with less training data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102719
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrological insights from a comparative evaluation of LSTM and MC-LSTM networks in the Ebro River basin (Spain)

Carmelo Juez, Inmaculada González-Planet
2 citations
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
article

Hydrological insights from a comparative evaluation of LSTM and MC-LSTM networks in the Ebro River basin (Spain)

Carmelo Juez, Inmaculada González-Planet
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The northern part of the Ebro River basin, Spain. Deep learning techniques are transforming streamflow modelling by delivering state-of-the-art predictions despite persistent challenges in interpretability and adherence to physical laws. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the standard Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network alongside its physically constrained variant, the Mass-Conserving LSTM (MC-LSTM), across multiple training scenarios applied to gauging stations in the Ebro River Basin (Spain). In addition to traditional metrics such as the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), our analysis uniquely disaggregates model performance by quantifying peak magnitude errors through normalized RMSE values stratified by specific return periods (T 0.5 , T 1 , T 2 , T 5 , T 10 ) and by assessing time delay errors using a wavelet coherence approach to capture temporal differences between observed and predicted discharge records. Our results indicate that while the regional LSTM model excels in predicting low and medium magnitude flows with accurate timing, its performance in modelling flood peaks is mixed. In contrast, the MC-LSTM model, leveraging its mass balance constraint as a regularization mechanism, demonstrates superior detection of high-magnitude events but exhibits distinct time lag characteristics. This integrated evaluation framework provides comprehensive insights into both the magnitude and temporal accuracy of deep learning hydrological models, underscoring the potential of incorporating physical constraints to achieve more robust and interpretable flood modelling. • Peak flow errors are evaluated using normalized RMSE for different return periods. • The MC-LSTM model shows excellent performance in flood predictions tasks. • Traditional LSTM models provide improved estimates of peak streamflow timing. • Sequence length selection is linked to dominant streamflow temporal dynamics. • The physical constraint in MC-LSTM improves generalization with less training data.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 61
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (ES)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, European Research Council, Research Executive Agency, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.