Studying feelings in action: An analytical framework for empirical analyses of affect in sustainability transitions

Research on feelings and emotions has gained importance for understanding sustainability transitions in recent years. However, a central question remains unanswered: How <i>precisely</i> does affect influence the creation of change in sustainability transitions and which conditions shape this relation? This paper calls for detailed in-situ studies in which affect can be linked to changes in habits and practices. It proposes an analytical framework based on transactional pragmatism and inspired by dramaturgical analysis to facilitate future research on this topic. The Dramaturgical Analysis of Affect in Sustainability Transitions (DAAST) framework allows studying affect in the set-up and design of activities as well as the interactions of people, and how these conditions influence change in collective settings. The DAAST gives facilitators and intermediaries tools to understand affect in potentially conflictual settings such as transition arenas and urban experiments. The end of this paper discusses the uses, potential, and limitations of the framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.101031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying feelings in action: An analytical framework for empirical analyses of affect in sustainability transitions

Katrien Van Poeck, Juliane V. Höhle
1 citations
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.11
article

Studying feelings in action: An analytical framework for empirical analyses of affect in sustainability transitions

Katrien Van Poeck, Juliane V. Höhle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research on feelings and emotions has gained importance for understanding sustainability transitions in recent years. However, a central question remains unanswered: How <i>precisely</i> does affect influence the creation of change in sustainability transitions and which conditions shape this relation? This paper calls for detailed in-situ studies in which affect can be linked to changes in habits and practices. It proposes an analytical framework based on transactional pragmatism and inspired by dramaturgical analysis to facilitate future research on this topic. The Dramaturgical Analysis of Affect in Sustainability Transitions (DAAST) framework allows studying affect in the set-up and design of activities as well as the interactions of people, and how these conditions influence change in collective settings. The DAAST gives facilitators and intermediaries tools to understand affect in potentially conflictual settings such as transition arenas and urban experiments. The end of this paper discusses the uses, potential, and limitations of the framework.

Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsVol. 57
Ghent University (BE)
European Commission, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Research Council, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Studying feelings in action: An analytical framework for empirical analyses of affect in sustainability transitions — Katrien Van Poeck, Juliane V. Höhle · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS