National Eye Institute Supported Randomized Controlled Trials in Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disorders: Lessons Learned

National Eye Institute (NEI)-funded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have significantly shaped the modern landscape of keratoplasty for endothelial disorders. Unlike retrospective studies, RCTs have offered the highest level of clinical evidence and have addressed critical questions related to histocompatibility matching, donor and donor tissue characteristics, donor tissue storage, and operative and postoperative factors supporting postoperative endothelial cell health. These RCTs have in turn directly influenced eye banking and keratoplasty practices. The purpose of this review is to 1) summarize the major findings from all of the NEI-sponsored keratoplasty RCTs, including the Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies, the Cornea Donor Study and its ancillary study, the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study, the Cornea Preservation Time Study, as well as the on-going Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study and the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial; 2) review select keratoplasty RCTs not supported by the NEI; 3) compare findings from these RCTs with those from the major keratoplasty registries; and 4) discuss promising future directions in keratoplasty and eye banking that would lend themselves for RCTs. Collectively, these RCTs have clarified long-standing controversies, validated emerging practices, and will continue to provide the foundation for future innovation in the surgical management of endothelial diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cornea
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000003967
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Eye Institute Supported Randomized Controlled Trials in Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disorders: Lessons Learned

Beth Ann Benetz, Ahmed F. Omar, Jonathan Carcione, Loretta B. Szczotka‐Flynn et al.
Cornea
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

National Eye Institute Supported Randomized Controlled Trials in Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disorders: Lessons Learned

Beth Ann Benetz, Ahmed F. Omar, Jonathan Carcione, Loretta B. Szczotka‐Flynn, Jonathan H. Lass
article en

Abstract

National Eye Institute (NEI)-funded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have significantly shaped the modern landscape of keratoplasty for endothelial disorders. Unlike retrospective studies, RCTs have offered the highest level of clinical evidence and have addressed critical questions related to histocompatibility matching, donor and donor tissue characteristics, donor tissue storage, and operative and postoperative factors supporting postoperative endothelial cell health. These RCTs have in turn directly influenced eye banking and keratoplasty practices. The purpose of this review is to 1) summarize the major findings from all of the NEI-sponsored keratoplasty RCTs, including the Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies, the Cornea Donor Study and its ancillary study, the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study, the Cornea Preservation Time Study, as well as the on-going Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study and the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial; 2) review select keratoplasty RCTs not supported by the NEI; 3) compare findings from these RCTs with those from the major keratoplasty registries; and 4) discuss promising future directions in keratoplasty and eye banking that would lend themselves for RCTs. Collectively, these RCTs have clarified long-standing controversies, validated emerging practices, and will continue to provide the foundation for future innovation in the surgical management of endothelial diseases.

CorneaVol. 44(11)
Case Western Reserve University (US), Assiut University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.