Educator experiences of intensive and blended teaching andragogy in <scp>UK</scp> higher education

Abstract Significant shifts in the higher education sector during 2020 required the adoption of flexible learning modalities. In response, the University of Suffolk implemented a blended learning approach, incorporating both online and face‐to‐face delivery. Notably, the university became the first UK higher education institution to implement an intensive delivery mode for undergraduate courses. We employed qualitative thematic analysis to explore the lived experiences of eight psychology educators through two focus groups, focusing on intensive and blended teaching andragogy. Our findings reveal that intensive delivery positively influences both learners and educators by enhancing knowledge focus and providing rapid, actionable feedback. However, it also presents challenges, such as increased time constraints, limited accessibility, and negative effects on wellbeing and skill development. Similarly, blended approaches yielded mixed outcomes: while it improves educator wellbeing, flexibility and inclusivity, it can also reduce learner social wellbeing and engagement. We offer several recommendations for institutions considering a move to intensive delivery, emphasising the importance of addressing the challenges. However, as our findings are limited to the educators' perspectives, we advocate for future research incorporating learner experiences through both qualitative and quantitative methods. Context and implications Rationale for this study : Due to a lack of focus from educators' perspectives, this UK study explores educators' experiences and evaluation of blended and intensive learning. Why the new findings matter : Findings reveal the importance of educator experiences in blended and intensive teaching models for educators and learners, emphasising the need for well‐considered andragogies that support engagement, adaptability and outcomes. Implications for educational institutions, policymakers, educators and learners : The research informs UK higher education institutions in evaluating and refining teaching structures to align with course requirements and learner needs. Insights can guide institutions in adopting evidence‐based best practices to enhance student learning experiences and educator effectiveness. Additionally, findings can guide policymakers in developing appropriate teaching delivery strategies for diverse learners and educators. Well‐considered andragogy may also benefit prospective and current learners by fostering engagement, social connectedness, and supporting better learning outcomes. Institutions can use these findings to implement adaptive teaching models that improve flexibility, accessibility, and overall educational quality, ensuring a more effective and inclusive higher education environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Education
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70105
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educator experiences of intensive and blended teaching andragogy in UK higher education

Jennifer Coe, Rachel Grenfell‐Essam, Abbie C. Millett, Sarah Beane
1 citations
Review of Education
Innovative Teaching Methods
8.93
article

Educator experiences of intensive and blended teaching andragogy in UK higher education

Jennifer Coe, Rachel Grenfell‐Essam, Abbie C. Millett, Sarah Beane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Significant shifts in the higher education sector during 2020 required the adoption of flexible learning modalities. In response, the University of Suffolk implemented a blended learning approach, incorporating both online and face‐to‐face delivery. Notably, the university became the first UK higher education institution to implement an intensive delivery mode for undergraduate courses. We employed qualitative thematic analysis to explore the lived experiences of eight psychology educators through two focus groups, focusing on intensive and blended teaching andragogy. Our findings reveal that intensive delivery positively influences both learners and educators by enhancing knowledge focus and providing rapid, actionable feedback. However, it also presents challenges, such as increased time constraints, limited accessibility, and negative effects on wellbeing and skill development. Similarly, blended approaches yielded mixed outcomes: while it improves educator wellbeing, flexibility and inclusivity, it can also reduce learner social wellbeing and engagement. We offer several recommendations for institutions considering a move to intensive delivery, emphasising the importance of addressing the challenges. However, as our findings are limited to the educators' perspectives, we advocate for future research incorporating learner experiences through both qualitative and quantitative methods. Context and implications Rationale for this study : Due to a lack of focus from educators' perspectives, this UK study explores educators' experiences and evaluation of blended and intensive learning. Why the new findings matter : Findings reveal the importance of educator experiences in blended and intensive teaching models for educators and learners, emphasising the need for well‐considered andragogies that support engagement, adaptability and outcomes. Implications for educational institutions, policymakers, educators and learners : The research informs UK higher education institutions in evaluating and refining teaching structures to align with course requirements and learner needs. Insights can guide institutions in adopting evidence‐based best practices to enhance student learning experiences and educator effectiveness. Additionally, findings can guide policymakers in developing appropriate teaching delivery strategies for diverse learners and educators. Well‐considered andragogy may also benefit prospective and current learners by fostering engagement, social connectedness, and supporting better learning outcomes. Institutions can use these findings to implement adaptive teaching models that improve flexibility, accessibility, and overall educational quality, ensuring a more effective and inclusive higher education environment.

Review of EducationVol. 13(3)
University of Suffolk (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Teaching Methods
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.