Inferior Outcomes of Posterior Correction and Fusion Surgery for Adults With Residual Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study With Adolescents

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether the outcomes of posterior correction and fusion surgery (PSF) in patients with residual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) during adulthood (Lenke type 5 AdIS) are inferior to those in patients with AIS treated during adolescence.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with type 5 AdIS who underwent PSF after 20 years old. As controls, we selected 67 patients with type 5 AIS who underwent PSF before 18 years old. Both groups were matched based on the preoperative thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angles, resulting in 33 patients in each group. We compared preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters and SRS-22 scores between the 2 groups.ResultsPreoperatively, the AdIS group had significantly lower flexibility index (59.0% ± 13.0% vs 66.6% ± 16.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.01). The preoperative SRS-22 scores for pain and mental health domain were significantly worse in the AdIS group (pain, 3.9 ± 0.8 vs 4.3 ± 0.7, <i>P</i> < 0.01; mental health, 3.6 ± 0.8 vs 4.2 ± 0.6, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The AdIS group had significantly more fused vertebrae and longer intraoperative time than the AIS group. Postoperatively, lumber Cobb angle (16.1° ± 5.6° vs 8.6° ± 4.0°, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and correction rate were both less favorable in the AdIS group. Both pain and mental health scores remained significantly worse in the AdIS group (pain: AdIS, 4.3 ± 0.6 vs AIS, 4.7 ± 0.3; <i>P</i> < 0.01; mental health: AdIS, 4.1 ± 0.7 vs AIS, 4.5 ± 0.5; <i>P</i> = 0.02).ConclusionPatients with type 5 AdIS had a similar correction of the major curve as those with AIS; however, the surgery was more invasive, with inferior postoperative clinical outcomes, than those with AIS. These findings suggest that the surgical timing should be carefully considered in patients with type 5 AIS to optimize outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251371620
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inferior Outcomes of Posterior Correction and Fusion Surgery for Adults With Residual Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study With Adolescents

Satoshi Suzuki, Narihito Nagoshi, Osahiko Tsuji, Reo Shibata et al.
Global Spine Journal
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Inferior Outcomes of Posterior Correction and Fusion Surgery for Adults With Residual Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study With Adolescents

Satoshi Suzuki, Narihito Nagoshi, Osahiko Tsuji, Reo Shibata, Masahiro Ozaki, Takahito Iga, Toshiki Okubo, Kota Watanabe, Kazuki Takeda, Masaya Nakamura, Morio Matsumoto
article en

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether the outcomes of posterior correction and fusion surgery (PSF) in patients with residual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) during adulthood (Lenke type 5 AdIS) are inferior to those in patients with AIS treated during adolescence.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with type 5 AdIS who underwent PSF after 20 years old. As controls, we selected 67 patients with type 5 AIS who underwent PSF before 18 years old. Both groups were matched based on the preoperative thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angles, resulting in 33 patients in each group. We compared preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters and SRS-22 scores between the 2 groups.ResultsPreoperatively, the AdIS group had significantly lower flexibility index (59.0% ± 13.0% vs 66.6% ± 16.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.01). The preoperative SRS-22 scores for pain and mental health domain were significantly worse in the AdIS group (pain, 3.9 ± 0.8 vs 4.3 ± 0.7, <i>P</i> < 0.01; mental health, 3.6 ± 0.8 vs 4.2 ± 0.6, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The AdIS group had significantly more fused vertebrae and longer intraoperative time than the AIS group. Postoperatively, lumber Cobb angle (16.1° ± 5.6° vs 8.6° ± 4.0°, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and correction rate were both less favorable in the AdIS group. Both pain and mental health scores remained significantly worse in the AdIS group (pain: AdIS, 4.3 ± 0.6 vs AIS, 4.7 ± 0.3; <i>P</i> < 0.01; mental health: AdIS, 4.1 ± 0.7 vs AIS, 4.5 ± 0.5; <i>P</i> = 0.02).ConclusionPatients with type 5 AdIS had a similar correction of the major curve as those with AIS; however, the surgery was more invasive, with inferior postoperative clinical outcomes, than those with AIS. These findings suggest that the surgical timing should be carefully considered in patients with type 5 AIS to optimize outcomes.

Global Spine JournalVol. 16(2)
Keio University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.