Validation of the Ipswich Touch Test for Screening of Loss of Protective Sensation and Peripheral Neuropathy in Type II Diabetes

Introduction: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes that significantly increases the risk of foot ulceration and amputation. Early detection of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) is critical, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to validate the Ipswich Touch Test (IpTT), a simple and non-invasive screening tool, against the 10 g monofilament (MF) and other neurological assessments in individuals with Type II diabetes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among Type II diabetic patients from the XXX Diabetes (SeDia) Cohort. Participants underwent foot examinations using MF (reference standard), IpTT, and pinprick, vibration, and ankle reflex tests. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and agreement (kappa coefficient) were calculated. Results: Among 315 participants, the prevalence of LOPS/DPN was 14.6%. IpTT demonstrated 90.5% accuracy, with a sensitivity of 41.3% and specificity of 98.9% compared to MF. Agreement between IpTT and MF was moderate (κ = 0.513, p < 0.001). Vibration testing had the highest sensitivity, while pinprick showed the best specificity. Ankle reflex testing performed poorly. Conclusion: IpTT is a highly specific and accurate screening tool suitable for use in low-resource settings. Despite limited sensitivity, it is a valuable adjunct to other neurological tests in detecting LOPS and DPN.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-3634/1410187
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Ipswich Touch Test for Screening of Loss of Protective Sensation and Peripheral Neuropathy in Type II Diabetes

Ikram Shah Ismail, Lokman Hakim Sulaiman, Zairul Nizam Zainol Fithri, Normy Narihan et al.
International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Validation of the Ipswich Touch Test for Screening of Loss of Protective Sensation and Peripheral Neuropathy in Type II Diabetes

Ikram Shah Ismail, Lokman Hakim Sulaiman, Zairul Nizam Zainol Fithri, Normy Narihan, Shamini Nadaraja, Adila Selamat
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes that significantly increases the risk of foot ulceration and amputation. Early detection of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) is critical, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to validate the Ipswich Touch Test (IpTT), a simple and non-invasive screening tool, against the 10 g monofilament (MF) and other neurological assessments in individuals with Type II diabetes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among Type II diabetic patients from the XXX Diabetes (SeDia) Cohort. Participants underwent foot examinations using MF (reference standard), IpTT, and pinprick, vibration, and ankle reflex tests. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and agreement (kappa coefficient) were calculated. Results: Among 315 participants, the prevalence of LOPS/DPN was 14.6%. IpTT demonstrated 90.5% accuracy, with a sensitivity of 41.3% and specificity of 98.9% compared to MF. Agreement between IpTT and MF was moderate (κ = 0.513, p < 0.001). Vibration testing had the highest sensitivity, while pinprick showed the best specificity. Ankle reflex testing performed poorly. Conclusion: IpTT is a highly specific and accurate screening tool suitable for use in low-resource settings. Despite limited sensitivity, it is a valuable adjunct to other neurological tests in detecting LOPS and DPN.

International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical ResearchVol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.