Fueling the rush – it’s all about caffeine

Background The primary aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an energy drink vs. a caffeine-matched control on measures of sustained attention.Methods Using a randomized, double-blind design (n = 107), subjects were assigned to an energy drink (C4 – Nutrabolt®) or a caffeine-matched control (200 mg caffeine). The following assessments were conducted before and approximately 45 minutes after consuming an energy drink or caffeine-matched control: psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), Memtrax (memory), handgrip strength, and wall-sit endurance.Results Both the energy drink and the caffeine-matched control improved pre vs. post for the PVT; however, there were no differences in the delta score. The energy drink group had a significant decrease in the Memtrax assessment (% correct) whereas reaction time increased with no change in the control; however, there were no differences in the delta score between groups for either the % correct score or reaction time. There were no significant differences in the handgrip or wall-sit assessments for either group.Conclusions Consuming 200 mg of caffeine, whether it is part of an energy drink or is a stand-alone ingredient, induces significant improvements in sustained attention and alertness (i.e. reaction time assessed by the PVT). However, there were no differences in memory, handgrip strength, or wall-sit endurance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2025.2550145
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fueling the rush – it’s all about caffeine

Tobin Silver, José Antonio, Lia Jiannine, Catherine Holen
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Coffee research and impacts
article

Fueling the rush – it’s all about caffeine

Tobin Silver, José Antonio, Lia Jiannine, Catherine Holen
article en

Abstract

Background The primary aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an energy drink vs. a caffeine-matched control on measures of sustained attention.Methods Using a randomized, double-blind design (n = 107), subjects were assigned to an energy drink (C4 – Nutrabolt®) or a caffeine-matched control (200 mg caffeine). The following assessments were conducted before and approximately 45 minutes after consuming an energy drink or caffeine-matched control: psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), Memtrax (memory), handgrip strength, and wall-sit endurance.Results Both the energy drink and the caffeine-matched control improved pre vs. post for the PVT; however, there were no differences in the delta score. The energy drink group had a significant decrease in the Memtrax assessment (% correct) whereas reaction time increased with no change in the control; however, there were no differences in the delta score between groups for either the % correct score or reaction time. There were no significant differences in the handgrip or wall-sit assessments for either group.Conclusions Consuming 200 mg of caffeine, whether it is part of an energy drink or is a stand-alone ingredient, induces significant improvements in sustained attention and alertness (i.e. reaction time assessed by the PVT). However, there were no differences in memory, handgrip strength, or wall-sit endurance.

Journal of the International Society of Sports NutritionVol. 22(sup2)
Nova Southeastern University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.