Addressing the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge: Economic and Environmental Insights from Feedstock Optimization

This study assesses the potential for purpose-grown bioenergy feedstocks to meet the United States Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Grand Challenge targets. A combined life cycle assessment, techno-economic analysis, geospatial modeling, and evolutionary optimization framework was applied to evaluate the county-level deployment of nine feedstocks across seven land classifications. The findings underscore critical trade-offs between land use, fuel production costs, and emissions reductions in achieving national SAF targets. In cost-optimized scenarios, sorghum and miscanthus comprise most of the production (together >95%), achieving minimum fuel selling prices as low as $3.24 gallon<sup>-1</sup>. Cultivation land-minimizing scenarios favor algae exclusively, reducing land use to 0.5% of the contiguous U.S., but with higher fuel prices and emissions. Emissions-optimized scenarios are largely composed of miscanthus (>99%), achieving life-cycle emissions below 5 gCO<sub>2-eq</sub> MJ<sup>-1</sup>. The breakeven carbon price optimized scenarios deploy a mix of miscanthus (86%), sorghum (13%), and soy (1%); balancing low fuel cost and emissions with a breakeven carbon price of $161 tCO<sub>2-eq</sub><sup>-1</sup>. Across all cases, feedstock yields, biomass-to-fuel conversion efficiencies, and spatial heterogeneity strongly influence feasibility. These results highlight the importance of coordinated optimization strategies to enable cost-effective, low-carbon SAF production and support efforts to inform energy policy, supply chain planning, and commercialization pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c05842
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge: Economic and Environmental Insights from Feedstock Optimization

Braden J. Limb, Jason C. Quinn, Steve Simske, Jack P. Smith
4 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
1.45
article

Addressing the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge: Economic and Environmental Insights from Feedstock Optimization

Braden J. Limb, Jason C. Quinn, Steve Simske, Jack P. Smith
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study assesses the potential for purpose-grown bioenergy feedstocks to meet the United States Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Grand Challenge targets. A combined life cycle assessment, techno-economic analysis, geospatial modeling, and evolutionary optimization framework was applied to evaluate the county-level deployment of nine feedstocks across seven land classifications. The findings underscore critical trade-offs between land use, fuel production costs, and emissions reductions in achieving national SAF targets. In cost-optimized scenarios, sorghum and miscanthus comprise most of the production (together >95%), achieving minimum fuel selling prices as low as $3.24 gallon<sup>-1</sup>. Cultivation land-minimizing scenarios favor algae exclusively, reducing land use to 0.5% of the contiguous U.S., but with higher fuel prices and emissions. Emissions-optimized scenarios are largely composed of miscanthus (>99%), achieving life-cycle emissions below 5 gCO<sub>2-eq</sub> MJ<sup>-1</sup>. The breakeven carbon price optimized scenarios deploy a mix of miscanthus (86%), sorghum (13%), and soy (1%); balancing low fuel cost and emissions with a breakeven carbon price of $161 tCO<sub>2-eq</sub><sup>-1</sup>. Across all cases, feedstock yields, biomass-to-fuel conversion efficiencies, and spatial heterogeneity strongly influence feasibility. These results highlight the importance of coordinated optimization strategies to enable cost-effective, low-carbon SAF production and support efforts to inform energy policy, supply chain planning, and commercialization pathways.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(35)
Engineering Systems (United States) (US), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
1.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.