Promoting Professionalism in Medical Practice through Compassionate Transformation: A Systematic Review

Objective: Medical professionalism (MP) refers to the values, behaviors, and attitudes that enhance professional relation- ships, public trust, and patient safety. Formal and informal medical curricula convey expectations about professionalization. The We conducted this systematic review with aimed to explain the motivation for exploring compassionate transformation as a pathway to improved medical professionalism in healthcare settings. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. These electronic databases encom- passing MEDLINE, Hinari, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, EMBASE; and grey literature were systematically searched using the following MeSH search terms: Promoting Professionalism, Medical practice, Compassionate Transformation. The search criteria incorporated relevant full articles published in English from January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2025 that targeting any aspect of medical professionalism were included. Review articles and evaluations that included non-health care professionals were excluded. Of the included reviews, all included reviews did not conduct quantitative or meta-analysis of the results but rather conducted a qualitative descriptive summary. The systematic quality of the included reviews was assessed using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool. Results: The search identified 1898 studies for eligibility screening. Ultimately, 14 studies characteristics were eligible for inclusion. The fundamental elements of medical professionalism (MP) were altruism, honesty, professional competence, compassion, responsibility, confidentiality, respect, accountability, excellence, communication, maturity, self-directed learn- ing, scholarship, and leadership. Although measuring professionalism in healthcare is difficult, it is essential to ensuring high-quality treatment and patient trust. Physician burnout also affects professionalism and patient safety, highlighting a structural problem in the medical field that needs to be addressed. MP differs depending on a variety of elements, including generational, social, cultural, contextual, and conceptual issues. Conclusion: Medical professionalism has been a core value and responsibility of physicians in the care of patients. It became a powerful slogan in medical science that “professionalism must be taught”, and a consensus had to be built that professional- ism should be an intrinsic part of the curriculum. CME J 2025; 4(1); 54-63

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CME journal
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/cmej.v4i1.83642
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting Professionalism in Medical Practice through Compassionate Transformation: A Systematic Review

Thanadar Tamjeeda Tapu, Nilima Barman, Md Mohibur Rahman, Mohammad Abu Sayeed Talukder et al.
CME journal
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Promoting Professionalism in Medical Practice through Compassionate Transformation: A Systematic Review

Thanadar Tamjeeda Tapu, Nilima Barman, Md Mohibur Rahman, Mohammad Abu Sayeed Talukder, Mowshumi Rahman, Mohammed Shadrul Alam, Md Abdal Miah, Nahidul Khan, Nahid Noor Tusar
article en

Abstract

Objective: Medical professionalism (MP) refers to the values, behaviors, and attitudes that enhance professional relation- ships, public trust, and patient safety. Formal and informal medical curricula convey expectations about professionalization. The We conducted this systematic review with aimed to explain the motivation for exploring compassionate transformation as a pathway to improved medical professionalism in healthcare settings. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. These electronic databases encom- passing MEDLINE, Hinari, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, EMBASE; and grey literature were systematically searched using the following MeSH search terms: Promoting Professionalism, Medical practice, Compassionate Transformation. The search criteria incorporated relevant full articles published in English from January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2025 that targeting any aspect of medical professionalism were included. Review articles and evaluations that included non-health care professionals were excluded. Of the included reviews, all included reviews did not conduct quantitative or meta-analysis of the results but rather conducted a qualitative descriptive summary. The systematic quality of the included reviews was assessed using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool. Results: The search identified 1898 studies for eligibility screening. Ultimately, 14 studies characteristics were eligible for inclusion. The fundamental elements of medical professionalism (MP) were altruism, honesty, professional competence, compassion, responsibility, confidentiality, respect, accountability, excellence, communication, maturity, self-directed learn- ing, scholarship, and leadership. Although measuring professionalism in healthcare is difficult, it is essential to ensuring high-quality treatment and patient trust. Physician burnout also affects professionalism and patient safety, highlighting a structural problem in the medical field that needs to be addressed. MP differs depending on a variety of elements, including generational, social, cultural, contextual, and conceptual issues. Conclusion: Medical professionalism has been a core value and responsibility of physicians in the care of patients. It became a powerful slogan in medical science that “professionalism must be taught”, and a consensus had to be built that professional- ism should be an intrinsic part of the curriculum. CME J 2025; 4(1); 54-63

CME journalVol. 4(1)
Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BD), St. Luke's Hospital (US), Armed Forces Medical College (BD), Artistic Realization Technologies (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.