Tick size and firm financing decisions: Evidence from a natural experiment

• We use the SEC’s 2016 Tick Size Pilot Program (TSPP) as a natural experiment of tick size increase. • We investigate the effects of a tick size increase on firms’ choice of equity versus debt financing. • We find that after the TSPP’s implementation, TSPP-affected firms show a significant increase in equity relative to debt issuance. • The TSPP’s effect is concentrated among firms with investors that actually increase their information acquisition. • The TSPP’s effect is more pronounced for firms that, prior to the program, have a higher level of concern about adverse selection in equity financing. Using the SEC’s 2016 Tick Size Pilot Program (TSPP) as a natural experiment, we investigate the effects of a tick size increase on firms’ choice of equity versus debt financing. We find that after the program’s implementation, TSPP-affected firms show a significant increase in equity issuance relative to that of debt. This finding is consistent with a reduction in adverse selection in equity financing due to more acquisition of fundamental information by these firms’ investors. In support of this inference, we show that the increase is concentrated among firms with investors that increase their information acquisition. We also find that the effect is more pronounced for firms that, prior to the program, have a higher level of concern about adverse selection in equity financing. Our study offers the novel insight that a tick size increase can affect firms’ financing choices because the increased tick size generates incentives for investors to acquire more fundamental information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Finance
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2025.101651
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tick size and firm financing decisions: Evidence from a natural experiment

Emmanuel Ofosu, Jeffrey Ng, Xin Yang, Yangyang Chen
1 citations
Journal of Empirical Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
article

Tick size and firm financing decisions: Evidence from a natural experiment

Emmanuel Ofosu, Jeffrey Ng, Xin Yang, Yangyang Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• We use the SEC’s 2016 Tick Size Pilot Program (TSPP) as a natural experiment of tick size increase. • We investigate the effects of a tick size increase on firms’ choice of equity versus debt financing. • We find that after the TSPP’s implementation, TSPP-affected firms show a significant increase in equity relative to debt issuance. • The TSPP’s effect is concentrated among firms with investors that actually increase their information acquisition. • The TSPP’s effect is more pronounced for firms that, prior to the program, have a higher level of concern about adverse selection in equity financing. Using the SEC’s 2016 Tick Size Pilot Program (TSPP) as a natural experiment, we investigate the effects of a tick size increase on firms’ choice of equity versus debt financing. We find that after the program’s implementation, TSPP-affected firms show a significant increase in equity issuance relative to that of debt. This finding is consistent with a reduction in adverse selection in equity financing due to more acquisition of fundamental information by these firms’ investors. In support of this inference, we show that the increase is concentrated among firms with investors that increase their information acquisition. We also find that the effect is more pronounced for firms that, prior to the program, have a higher level of concern about adverse selection in equity financing. Our study offers the novel insight that a tick size increase can affect firms’ financing choices because the increased tick size generates incentives for investors to acquire more fundamental information.

Journal of Empirical FinanceVol. 83
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.