A comparison of the dorsomedial and the dorsolateral reach-to-grasp pathways’ roles in response to virtual visual perturbations of object goal

Traditional research approaches to the reach-to-grasp movement have employed real-world perturbations involving physical objects. Recent technological advances provide new avenues for the investigation of sensorimotor control including the use of Virtual Reality Environments (VE). In this study, we used an immersive VE to produce compelling perturbations of target object size and position and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to probe the neural bases of compensatory responses during grasping movements. Extensive research has identified a Dorsolateral (DL) and a Dorsomedial (DM) pathway as the likely neural bases for the sensorimotor coordination underlying grasping movements. In order to test the causal involvement of the parietal and premotor nodes of both pathways, we implemented visual perturbations of object size and distance at two different latencies (100 and 300 ms after movement onset) with concurrent TMS in a fully randomized design. The kinematic profiles of the grasping movements exhibited clear effects of the visual perturbations, particularly the late ones. We found that TMS stimulation of aIPS during the late perturbation of object size modified the timing of aperture closing. Similarly, TMS to PMv during the late perturbation of object distance reduced transport velocity during the compensatory double-peak. Our results support the involvement of the DL pathway when quick modifications including complex digit control are required. Against our expectations, sudden changes in target position did not elicit activity in the DM pathway. This study supports the notion that VE can be successfully employed for the study of the neural substrates of motor control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121428
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of the dorsomedial and the dorsolateral reach-to-grasp pathways’ roles in response to virtual visual perturbations of object goal

Eugene Tunik, Luis F. Schettino, Mathew Yarossi, Mariusz P. Furmanek et al.
NeuroImage
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

A comparison of the dorsomedial and the dorsolateral reach-to-grasp pathways’ roles in response to virtual visual perturbations of object goal

Eugene Tunik, Luis F. Schettino, Mathew Yarossi, Mariusz P. Furmanek, Sergei V. Adamovich
article en

Abstract

Traditional research approaches to the reach-to-grasp movement have employed real-world perturbations involving physical objects. Recent technological advances provide new avenues for the investigation of sensorimotor control including the use of Virtual Reality Environments (VE). In this study, we used an immersive VE to produce compelling perturbations of target object size and position and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to probe the neural bases of compensatory responses during grasping movements. Extensive research has identified a Dorsolateral (DL) and a Dorsomedial (DM) pathway as the likely neural bases for the sensorimotor coordination underlying grasping movements. In order to test the causal involvement of the parietal and premotor nodes of both pathways, we implemented visual perturbations of object size and distance at two different latencies (100 and 300 ms after movement onset) with concurrent TMS in a fully randomized design. The kinematic profiles of the grasping movements exhibited clear effects of the visual perturbations, particularly the late ones. We found that TMS stimulation of aIPS during the late perturbation of object size modified the timing of aperture closing. Similarly, TMS to PMv during the late perturbation of object distance reduced transport velocity during the compensatory double-peak. Our results support the involvement of the DL pathway when quick modifications including complex digit control are required. Against our expectations, sudden changes in target position did not elicit activity in the DM pathway. This study supports the notion that VE can be successfully employed for the study of the neural substrates of motor control.

NeuroImageVol. 319
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Northeastern University (US), Lafayette College (US), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.