Coping with Emotionally Challenging Research: Developing a Strategic Approach to Researcher Wellbeing

While previous work has highlighted the possible impacts of undertaking emotionally challenging research, it is only recently, particularly within the UK with the 2028 Research Excellence Framework focus on research culture, that this subject is starting to gain senior leadership attention. Funded by the UK Research and Innovation, Researcher England, Enhancing Research Culture fund. We undertook an in-depth study involving researchers across topics and disciplines in the humanities and social science, with the objectives of establishing: the impacts of studying emotionally challenging topics on researchers, what they currently found helpful in preventing and/or coping with these impacts, and what additional support they wanted. In this paper we report on findings related to the latter two objectives to provide insight into how future research projects could be ethically designed to minimize distress, secondary and vicarious trauma in researchers. We then use these findings to formulate an innovative strategic institutional response to researcher wellbeing and emotionally challenging studies that can be implemented in three stages: <i>Bronze</i>, which is focused on awareness raising and the development of policies and guidance that are built into ethical procedures; <i>Silver</i>, involving the establishment of training, clear referral pathways, and (funded) Researcher Wellbeing Plans - including regular academic supervision, team working, and extra time in workloads to undertake wellbeing interventions - built into the design of projects; and <i>Gold</i>, a wholistic institutional response where, in addition to the above, policies, processes, practices and culture are proactively attentive to the prevention of and provision for distress relating to emotionally challenging research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Academic Ethics
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09665-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coping with Emotionally Challenging Research: Developing a Strategic Approach to Researcher Wellbeing

Kristine Brance, Sarah L. Halligan, Tina Skinner, Emily Tsang et al.
4 citations
Journal of Academic Ethics
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
16.81
article

Coping with Emotionally Challenging Research: Developing a Strategic Approach to Researcher Wellbeing

Kristine Brance, Sarah L. Halligan, Tina Skinner, Emily Tsang, Heather Girling
article en
4 citations

Abstract

While previous work has highlighted the possible impacts of undertaking emotionally challenging research, it is only recently, particularly within the UK with the 2028 Research Excellence Framework focus on research culture, that this subject is starting to gain senior leadership attention. Funded by the UK Research and Innovation, Researcher England, Enhancing Research Culture fund. We undertook an in-depth study involving researchers across topics and disciplines in the humanities and social science, with the objectives of establishing: the impacts of studying emotionally challenging topics on researchers, what they currently found helpful in preventing and/or coping with these impacts, and what additional support they wanted. In this paper we report on findings related to the latter two objectives to provide insight into how future research projects could be ethically designed to minimize distress, secondary and vicarious trauma in researchers. We then use these findings to formulate an innovative strategic institutional response to researcher wellbeing and emotionally challenging studies that can be implemented in three stages: <i>Bronze</i>, which is focused on awareness raising and the development of policies and guidance that are built into ethical procedures; <i>Silver</i>, involving the establishment of training, clear referral pathways, and (funded) Researcher Wellbeing Plans - including regular academic supervision, team working, and extra time in workloads to undertake wellbeing interventions - built into the design of projects; and <i>Gold</i>, a wholistic institutional response where, in addition to the above, policies, processes, practices and culture are proactively attentive to the prevention of and provision for distress relating to emotionally challenging research.

Journal of Academic EthicsVol. 23(4)
University of Limerick (IE), University of Bath (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, University of Bath, Research England
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.