Misunderstandings and Clarifications in the Identification of Defective Evidence and Illegal Evidence

In the trial of cases, evidence has always been a crucial part of the trial process. Clarifying the application rules of evidence is not only conducive to fully pro-tecting the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved but also can effectively promote fair adjudication. However, from the current judicial situa-tion, there are numerous misunderstandings in the identification of defec-tive evidence and illegal evidence. The existence of these misunderstandings will not only affect the handling of evidence but also interfere with the trial of cases, so this issue must be taken seriously. Therefore, this article takes the misunder-standings in the identification of defective evidence and illegal evi-dence as the research object. On the basis of clarifying relevant concepts, it an-alyzes the misunderstandings existing in judicial practice and puts forward tar-geted solu-tions, hoping to further promote the handling of evidence-related issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63313/ssh.9019
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misunderstandings and Clarifications in the Identification of Defective Evidence and Illegal Evidence

T. Zhang
Social Sciences and Humanities
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

Misunderstandings and Clarifications in the Identification of Defective Evidence and Illegal Evidence

T. Zhang
article en

Abstract

In the trial of cases, evidence has always been a crucial part of the trial process. Clarifying the application rules of evidence is not only conducive to fully pro-tecting the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved but also can effectively promote fair adjudication. However, from the current judicial situa-tion, there are numerous misunderstandings in the identification of defec-tive evidence and illegal evidence. The existence of these misunderstandings will not only affect the handling of evidence but also interfere with the trial of cases, so this issue must be taken seriously. Therefore, this article takes the misunder-standings in the identification of defective evidence and illegal evi-dence as the research object. On the basis of clarifying relevant concepts, it an-alyzes the misunderstandings existing in judicial practice and puts forward tar-geted solu-tions, hoping to further promote the handling of evidence-related issues.

Social Sciences and HumanitiesVol. 1(2)
Anhui University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.