Accounting vs technical information: what matters more for stock return predictability?

• Technical data predicts stock returns better than accounting information. • Market signals yield higher returns, especially at short forecasting horizons. • Accounting strategies are cheaper to trade and better for long-term forecasts. • Technical data dominates in volatile periods and for hard-to-value companies. • Both technical and accounting data contain independent predictive content. We employ machine learning models to determine what matters more for stock return predictability: technical data or accounting information. Technical data holds an advantage—it consistently yields more accurate forecasts and higher portfolio returns. This superiority is not limited to the U.S. market but extends to major developed markets worldwide, at times showing even stronger effects. Furthermore, it remains remarkably robust across firm sizes and time periods. However, its edge is most pronounced at short horizons and comes at the cost of higher turnover. Accounting signals, while weaker overall, perform better over longer horizons and support lower-cost implementation. Finally, technical strategies excel in volatile, hard-to-value contexts, whereas accounting-based models fare better when valuation uncertainty is low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102207
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting vs technical information: what matters more for stock return predictability?

Adam Zaremba, Nusret Cakici
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Accounting vs technical information: what matters more for stock return predictability?

Adam Zaremba, Nusret Cakici
article en

Abstract

• Technical data predicts stock returns better than accounting information. • Market signals yield higher returns, especially at short forecasting horizons. • Accounting strategies are cheaper to trade and better for long-term forecasts. • Technical data dominates in volatile periods and for hard-to-value companies. • Both technical and accounting data contain independent predictive content. We employ machine learning models to determine what matters more for stock return predictability: technical data or accounting information. Technical data holds an advantage—it consistently yields more accurate forecasts and higher portfolio returns. This superiority is not limited to the U.S. market but extends to major developed markets worldwide, at times showing even stronger effects. Furthermore, it remains remarkably robust across firm sizes and time periods. However, its edge is most pronounced at short horizons and comes at the cost of higher turnover. Accounting signals, while weaker overall, perform better over longer horizons and support lower-cost implementation. Finally, technical strategies excel in volatile, hard-to-value contexts, whereas accounting-based models fare better when valuation uncertainty is low.

Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and MoneyVol. 104
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL), Fordham University (US), Montpellier Business School (FR), Monash University (AU)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.